• daggermoon@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s a perfectly good building. Why destroy a home because an evil person lived there?

    • fizzle@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      If I lived in a suburb and nazis were always coming to visit whatever thing I would want to dismantle that thing to stop the nazis coming.

      • daggermoon@piefed.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 month ago

        I get that some people feel that way but I sort of see it the same way as I see a murder house. The fact that someone was murdered in a house does not affect the material condition of the building. Ultimately Austria can do as they wish with it. It just seems wasteful to me to destroy it. I’d rather see it made into an LGBT museum or something else Hitler would have hated that will benefit the community while pissing off nazis.

        • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          There’s varying levels of taint. And then how to responding to different levels of taint is always historically controversial.

          I’m not losing any sleep over Hitler’s house being obliterated, though.