Ok great!

Hmm thats then a issue with piefed. Is there any message shown?

No the other part the moving of the chat is a little bit controversial too. But that is ok. The other change in that commit

We removed firefox relay for now. You can retry now.

Ahh yes, that is another risk factor of him. He never tests it. I guess he always goes for guts instincts. ( As there is no CI tests or any type hints ).

And again we speak of FORMATTING pr’s those risky formatting pr’s i guess he tested that? and somehow found that it didnt worked?

Just to be clear, i fixed a lot of bugs already too. E.g. Mastodon login never even worked ONCE, i implemented that to the end.
With his merge first fix later attitude, for little bit more established servers its killing argument: Oh yeah feature X broke because no one tested it before.

My PRs were in good faith. I was ok with constructive feedback ( e.g. change this, change that ) but dismissing ones PR MULTIPLE times. With almost none real reason other than “Opiniated Formatting” ( where none exists )

I mean i gave him the changes to his feet and he kicked them away. I know it were small changes but if i have to argue around for 4-5 session to implement basic formatting ( a one and done thing ). I would blick him too.

I hope that too for Piefed. But if he continues his disregard of developer. He should have kept it close source.

I had sadly the opposite experience as a developer. He bends the rules, the code of conduct to his will so that he stays in the “right”.

He disregards any improvements to the codes style ( formatting, styling, linting ) and when you point that out you just get the lemmy devs treatment. I mentioned, the code is a mess. He went on rampage declining any attempts to “untangle” or format the code. And he simply said “Go away and dont come back”.

One example: https://codeberg.org/rimu/pyfedi/commit/b341c2d4adf40147c34b100fbace886862d8ddc8

80€ is crazy nintendont games are just crazy priced and have fun getting one second hand games if nintendo allows it. 80€ for a AA game is much and a scam for a re released game because of a new poatform even tho old switch games should work.

Still 80€ is too much dont freaking accept this bs pricing

I mean especially as a parent do i want to waste 80€ for a game? And i mean switch (1) is that what you describe the switch 2 is a cashgrab you cant tell me differently.

Dont even get me started on them, switch 2 is a cashgrab no discussion. The only new thing is a mouse…

I did that with the steamdeck dock its pretty awesome that it can run a higher resolution secondary screen with full hd and game on the side.

It will soon just wait.

If Nintendo allows you to play their games get not a switch ditch their platform with their 10 games.

I mean its so closed off it should be.

If i am honest i dont have any games that DONT run on. It can run cyberpunk, baldurs gate, a lot other AAA / Indie games.

If it doesnt run, the devs did something SPECIAL to f*ck steamdeck / linux users.

The suspend game feature is probably the biggest player, especially when its idle it doesnt use any power ( except of course the common battery drain ) in comparison to windows “sleep” it just blacks out the screen and maybe run a little less background tasks.

Toe to Toe? At least the steamdeck can run Crysis. Switch not, easy Steamdeck win.

Performance upgrade on a already locked on 60fps ( some 30 ) games? on default on a LCD display? That they didnt even considered default on OLED display is just … cash grabby.

and lost it after the Wii U.

Switch was the last in the line of “inovation” and now they go for the cash grab.

Would still get a 1k steamdeck over a 600€ still overpriced switch 2 with 80€ rereleased crap. With vulnerabilities found in the first week of launch.

Woah in 2 years, that will be definitly not be forgotten until then…