In a similar vein, why can we not use the technology of RAM to prolong the life-cycle of an SSD?

  • Lemvi@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Writing to an SSD damages the SSD, however things saved to an SSD are persistent, meaning the data isn’t lost when the SSD doesn’t get any power. Writing to RAM doesn’t damage it and it is also quicker. However, data saved on RAM is not persistent, meaning that all data is lost as soon as the RAM is not connected to a power source. Also, RAM is a lot more expensive than SSD storage.

    RAMs are already used to avoid writing to (or reading from) the SSD or HDD when possible, the concept is called “Caching”

    • grahamsz@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even if it’s powered, RAM will lose its data on the order of a tenth of a second. RAM doesn’t just require power, it requires that your computer constantly read and rewrite it - so every 64ms your computer has to read every gigabyte of RAM and write it back.

      • Julian@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t the ram do that itself? Otherwise reading/writing all that data would waste tons of time for the CPU.

        • grahamsz@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes - it’s been the job of the DRAM controller for almost the entire history of computing. But that’s still a part of the computer and if it stops working then your RAM will go blank in a fraction of a second