And if so, why exactly? It says it’s end-to-end encrypted. The metadata isn’t. But what is metadata and is it bad that it’s not? Are there any other problematic things?

I think I have a few answers for these questions, but I was wondering if anyone else has good answers/explanations/links to share where I can inform myself more.

  • bouh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    They would better hide those evidences as best as they can, or they would lose a useful source of informations.

    That’s the whole game of intelligence: to be a step ahead of the opponent, it must believe its safe so you can steal useful informations. As soon as the breach is discovered, it ceases to be useful.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Sure. My point is that, as far as I believe anyone is currently aware, there is no evidence that any law enforcement agency has ever accessed the content of encrypted WhatsApp messages. That does not mean that it has never happened either, but anyone positively claiming so is doing it without actual evidence, which is something we should probably avoid doing.

      • bouh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        We can assess the security of the app though. And we should. And we should also bring awareness to the problems of closed sources.