• raven [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s very easy to say this, because it means you can just reject any evidence to the contrary as “not good” or “biased”.

    Accusations of genocide aren’t a fucking game. It’s either happening or it isn’t. Either the evidence is good or the evidence is bad (and all evidence is biased) So give us some good evidence.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What evidence would you accept? Because you act as though you’ve already convinced yourself it’s not real and wouldn’t accept any evidence to the contrary. What, precisely, would convince you that you’re wrong, if firsthand accounts aren’t good enough?