And no IPad version to

    • davidgro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      79
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yes it is, and because of who owns it, I would even prefer that to an unsandboxed closed source native binary.

        • sailingbythelee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s because the vast, vast, VAST majority of people have no idea that many apps are just showing a website. Also, the app version is almost always more efficient in terms of precious phone screen real estate compared to a browser. Apps also remember who you are so you don’t have to login. It isn’t hard to understand why people like them.

          That said, many apps are horrible from a privacy perspective. But that is largely hidden from the average user, most of whom simply don’t think much about online privacy anyway.

          I hope the ubiquity of irritating ads are the thin edge of the wedge that gets more people interested in ad-blocking, and then perhaps online privacy more generally.

    • kratoz29@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      works without a phone nearby nowadays?

      Last time I checked it kicked me out for no reason… But in a nutshell yes.