Fedora is moving a bit faster than Debian(but it’s pretty unstable), the main selling point is in my opinion dnf/rpm, but on a server a rhel clone would be a better choice. Pop OS and especially Mint are great distros, Debian is great but very outdated, I would try them live and then decide
After using Fedora Silverblue for some time I can not say it is unstable or Linux Mint is more stable. But Mint is sure old, I even compiled some shit for newer versions, which seemed ‘too much’. I now use GNOME and I absolutely love it, I could even skip Linux Mint entirely, Cinnamon is good, but feels old and lacks customization both KDE and GNOME have. I feel all that advices to use Linux Mint outdated, there are much easier and more modern distros, unmutability plays really well with flatpaks. Sure Mint is still good for older hardware or for those, who wants Windows-like experience.
Fedora is moving a bit faster than Debian(but it’s pretty unstable), the main selling point is in my opinion dnf/rpm, but on a server a rhel clone would be a better choice. Pop OS and especially Mint are great distros, Debian is great but very outdated, I would try them live and then decide
After using Fedora Silverblue for some time I can not say it is unstable or Linux Mint is more stable. But Mint is sure old, I even compiled some shit for newer versions, which seemed ‘too much’. I now use GNOME and I absolutely love it, I could even skip Linux Mint entirely, Cinnamon is good, but feels old and lacks customization both KDE and GNOME have. I feel all that advices to use Linux Mint outdated, there are much easier and more modern distros, unmutability plays really well with flatpaks. Sure Mint is still good for older hardware or for those, who wants Windows-like experience.