• Thranduil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well its day 0 now since you technically used them in this meme even if it was only the words

    • Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Nah, I hired an electrician to handle all that for me. Now if I want electricity all I have to do is stick a plug in a socket, or flip a switch. It’s way more convenient.

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the power into your house is off from 60Hz (or 50 depending on your region), an electrician isn’t going to do diddly.

        • datelmd5sum@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          How could it be off frequecy at house level? Aren’t the generators at the powerplants being spun at 50 or 60 times a second?

          • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not exactly. There’s a ratio of RPMs of the drive motor to the specific input of the alternator that generates the correct frequency. It depends on the way the alternator is designed (ie number of poles) that will yield the correct frequency, almost like a gear ratio, that is optimized for efficiency, and power plants have to constantly make slight adjustments to the drive motor speed the keep the frequency exact (usually done automatically within the drive control system).

            I’ve never seen frequency be an issue in a residential system, but in theory it could happen.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It used to be common for clocks to be driven directly off the electrical frequency. The US Navel Observatory would call up generator plants and tell them to slow down or speed up a little to make a correction to all the clocks. I’m not sure if that still happens, though.

              • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’ve heard that trope before, same reason clocks in US schools/govt institutions were always plugged into a wall, hence these. Nowadays, NTP has rendered that obsolete.

            • datelmd5sum@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t know how it’s in 60Hz regions, but here the generators are in 3 phases, 120 degrees apart. The voltage gets transformed to up to 400kV, still in 3 phases, and then down to 400V when it’s distributed to peoples’ homes. Then you can pull 400V 3-phase or 230V 1-phase from your wall.

              • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s the same here, though we have varying degrees of transmission and distribution voltages via transformers and regulators. In my area, power comes into our valley from the 500kv lines through the open desert, into the valley at 33kv, and stepped down to 5kv for neighborhood distribution that the single phase 240/120v transformers tap off for the EOL.

                More of what I was getting at was that generation is more or less the same across regions. Some external fuel source (whether it’s diesel, natural gas, nuclear, steam, etc) does its thing to drive a rotor that’s connected into an alternator which is essentially an electric motor but instead of the electric motor doing the driving, it’s being driven which generates power, and the RPMs of whatever given fueled drive mechanism are not necessarily 1:1 with the alternator speed.

          • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            My understanding is that if electrical demand starts outstripping supply the sinewave can start getting badly mishapen.

            From watching videos about synthesizers and playing with VCV Rack I’ve learned far more about waveforms than I ever did from any electrical education or research

    • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s because trigonometry is used to teach people geometry and nothing in real life application. You want basic trigonometry in real life we should use physics as a basis for why trigonometry is useful in real life. You can’t expect theory to be used in practicality when nobody has any experience.

      • dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I don’t understand, out of all of the things that we teach students in schools, out of all of the things that people don’t demand justification for learning, why Maths gets all of the flak. It’s the foundation on which the universe exists. If people don’t understand that they’re not just learning trigonometry “just cuz” then they probably don’t have much of a career in STEM planned for themselves. Which is fine, but western society’s blindspot for STEM is 100% attributed to the intentional undermining and dumbing-down of the education system.

        We regularly don’t give students justification for why they learn grammar, biology, chemistry, physics, visual art, and music. But as soon as you show someone a standard polynomial, they lose their fucking minds.

        • Asafum@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          18
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          For me, my “education” with math was "when you see this: 5/73¥π7^t then you use 5-8(25&6)_9gh8/6 not 5&6(9!4_89) ok memorize it for the test.

          Oh you want to know why or what it does or what it even is? No that’s college work. You’re in highschool, memorize it because reasons.

          Yeah… That’s not how my brain works no matter how badly I wish I did. I need to UNDERSTAND not memorize! I can’t memorize seemingly arbitrary bullshit that has no explained meaning. My brain instantly tosses it as irrelevant information.

          • MinekPo1 [it/she]@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I find that the best way for me to learn is to learn the use of something first , then find that something . Exploring a problem and finding the solution is way more engaging than repeating a basic task over and over again . And unfortunately schools , at least in western countries don’t have space for those things . Its all cramming cramming cramming , which sucks , both for the students who are weaker in a subject and those who are better at it .

            Students often reach for tools to bypass problems , not realising how useful that tool would be at understanding the problem . Learning becomes a chore , not something that one does for self improvement .

            In the US this is enforced even more by imperial units , which put one more roadblock when students try to use what they learned in a way which has any connection to the real world .

            It hurts , both being a student which has large voids in knowledge that is expected , being a student which is ahead of material by a large margin and seeing other students struggle with tasks , to me , simple . It hurts knowing how complex of a problem this is , especially as one notes its connections to the wider world , both how failures of the education system hurt our society and how society is not able to help our schools .

        • johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          I dunno, I see people complain about “why do we have to read books that are hundreds of years old?” too pretty frequently. Some people are just hostile to education. Honestly, cost aside, I’m a little disappointed in the number of people who complain about college as if the only thing you get out of college is a piece of paper.

          • Something Burger 🍔@jlai.lu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s a valid complaint. Why is Shakespeare more legitimate than, say, Stephen King for high school classes? Reading is reading, and asking students to read boring books because “they are classics” is the best way to discourage them.

            In high school, I had to read Phèdre, a story told in verses about some incestuous rednecks from Greek mythology or whatever, written in the 1600’s. It was painful.

            • frezik@midwest.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              For that matter, why do we read Shakespeare? They’re plays. Watch them as plays or movies. If kids first exposure to Star Wars was by reading the script, they’d hate that, too, and they should.

              • prime_number_314159@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                I had to read Shakespeare, then read another book about how witty and clever it was to the people of the time, then write a report about how witty and clever it was, once I understood the historical context. My conclusion that having to explain jokes is the death of humor got me a C-.

            • saigot@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              There are a lot more authors who took inspiration from shakespeare than Steven King. Shakespeare is just objectively more influential, tropes he invented are used all the time in many places and there is value to understanding where the source comes from.

            • DahGangalang@infosec.pub
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I think there’s something to be said about shared cultural experiences, and so reading some older books is probably a good thing.

              To clarify what I mean though: that means that we should be reading stuff that was written/popular when our grandparents were our age. Going back 200+ years should be saved for a history class cause that’s the real value in reading that material. In my opinion, Great Gatsby should be about the oldest book kids need to be reading for a literature class these days, and even that’s pushing it.

        • DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s the exposure that undermines it. Their isn’t enough exposure to real life application and examples. How many people never realise that velocity is a derivative of position over time or acceleration is a derivative of velocity over time. Or that the speed of light is a horizontal asymptote for matter.

        • MinekPo1 [it/she]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I feel like similar issues are also present in humanities , but they are less visible .

          I enjoy doing recreational linguistics , writhing poems , stories and argumentative texts , yet I always sucked at humanities at school . I learned a lot of what school tried to teach me on my own , often after failing to fully grasp it at school . On the flip side , a lot of time was spent learning about things I still do not know the use of , that I , with some difficulty , crammed for tests and forgotten .

          Even with maths which I am quite good at , I often entered new topics with some knowledge of them from doing maths recreationally , which was not that great for me , both as I did not have enough resources to find the gaps in my knowledge and as I spent time not building on the knowledge I already had .

          I think this is an issue of how little we focus on individuals in our schools , though this is not something I blame teachers for , to be clear , they have no option to do so , especially as being a teacher not rewarded enough , ignoring both the extra workload outside of school and with generally shitty pay .

          I often find that the best way for me to learn is via exploration , trying to do something and researching ways how to do things needed to reach the goal . This is unfortunately something school doesn’t have space for and I suspect it is one of the factors behind this misunderstanding .

          The reason I feel like maths gets more heat for not having a use is because its harder to convey meaning of abstract equations , as someone else in this thread put better then I can , many students , I feel like , miss a deeper understanding , being left with only what is needed to pass the test , forgetting even that soon after …

  • Muffi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trig is honestly the math I’ve used the most since finishing school. But to be fair, that is mostly because it’s useful as hell when doing game development as a hobby.

    • themelm@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or building some stairs or really a ton of shit. Basic trig is such a useful thing that it tells me people who complain about it have never built anything, virtual or physical.

    • MinekPo1 [it/she]@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      as I’ve said in a different comment , it sucks how little space school gives to recreational usage of the skills we learn . I deeply enjoy recreational linguistics , writing , yet school seldom gave me the tools I find useful , having to find them on my own , despite being thought them previously .

    • fossphi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Fair enough, but did they use it? I always felt like focusing on statistics instead of random trig stuff for non stem people people would be more useful

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sticking with image compression, see Quite Okay Images. It treats each pixel as three numbers and expects mostly small changes. Recent pixels get hashed and can be referenced in a few bits. This is enough to compete with PNG filesizes, an order of magnitude faster, while handling each pixel exactly once.

        • MinekPo1 [it/she]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          though note than lossy formats , like JPEG which was used here , do use Fourier transforms , which are very intense trigonometry . IIRC PNG doesn’t use trigonometry either , though I’m not entirely sure yup PNG uses DEFLATE after some filtering , so no sine there I believe

      • enkers@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Agreed, I use highschool level stats knowledge on a nearly daily basis, whereas the last time I did any trig was to follow along with a math video I was watching on YouTube. Trig/calc were mandatory, stats was not.

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          And stats really should be a mainline math class in high school. It comes up in so many places, and is far too often simplified away into a binary black & white choice.

          Any time something happens that was predicted to be less than 50% likely, people lose their shit. For instance, when it unexpectedly rains or the wrong person wins an election.

          But it’s not even being able to run the numbers or understanding statistical significance. It’s much more basic, just understanding that probabilities and uncertainty exist and are everywhere. My favorite example is when going to the doctor. They explain that whatever you have is probably X or Y, with a small chance of Z, but Y has been going around a lot and is easy to treat, so let’s try medication A for it. Then when that gets reported to friends and family afterwards, it’s “she said I have Y and I need A to fix it.”

          • frezik@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Plus, if someone needs calculus for their major, they’ll just make them take it again in college. Why build high school math around it?

      • MinekPo1 [it/she]@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        JPEG uses a lossy form of compression based on the discrete cosine transform (DCT).

        - Wikipedia - JPEG

        Many modern compression schemes are more about signal processing than statistics , especially the lossy ones . IIRC 3blue1brown has a video on image compression if you want to learn about it in a visual way

    • slackassassin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      Best take right here. Trig shows up a lot when you actually do stuff. Woodworking, programming, physics, art, music, philosophy. Math shit is universal human language.

        • Gaia [She/Her]@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m might be splitting hairs, but I would argue by virtue of using a machine that uses trig, an individual is using trig, though abstractly. I’m sure you’re brother is dumb, yes.

  • Gnome Kat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like math :) Its mysterious and fascinating and constantly surprising, like seeing the source code of the universe. Closest shit we have to actual magic.

    • PeWu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do I like math? Yes

      Do I understand a tiny bit of it? Absolutely not

    • Yuumi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      HAHAHAHA GOOD LUCK! I’m in my final year of my EE study and I cannot wait to escape this mental asylum

      • Omgarm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Electrical Engineers are the psychos for using j instead of i. Absolutely bonkers.

        • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, I agree. They messed up the scheme we had going. It was a good thing, and electrical engineers had to come and be all different, confusing everyone else along the way.

          • Hoptrain@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            From my point of view the mathematicians are evil. I can’t stand them using i in my math classes, messing my whole scheme up. Respect for my physics prof in my first semester for switching to use the correct letter j

            • kpw@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              From my point of view the mathematicians are evil.

              Well, then you are lost!

            • NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              That’s a bit much dude, mathematicians gave us complex numbers. You can’t hate too much on the ones who invented our jobs 🤣

      • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        There is hope for you after the asylum. My daughter has an EE degree. While in school, she would call me every October and tell me how terrible it was and that she wanted to drop out. I would talk her off the ledge, and she got through.

        Now she’s working, making more money than I do in her early twenties, and she loves loves loves her job.

        Keep going!

      • RiderExMachina@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Luckily I have 6 years of Electronics manufacturing experience, so the math and theory are the things I’ll need to learn most of. Unfortunately, those things are the hardest part…

    • Chreutz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Don’t worry.

      Trig is not hard ☺️

      Compared to what you’re also gonna learn 🤣

      Signed, An EE graduate from 2016, who now works in embedded fixed point signal processing 😵

  • RushingSquirrel@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    1 year ago

    One day, while working on a website, I was wondering how to calculate a specific point in a graph. After googling, the answer was by using sine and cosine. Mind blew away, I had always thought I’d never use them.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      And guess what? You found it out without having to memorize the process until you knew it by heart.

      • zerofk@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apparently, they didn’t know it by heart. If they had, they wouldn’t have had to spend all that time searching.

          • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Complex? It’s just Sohcahtoa my friend

            I thought this was early high-school level stuff.

            • atkion@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              Since becoming an adult it has become increasingly obvious to me that early high-school level stuff is impossibly complex for a significant chunk of the population.

              • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                It’s unfortunate that you are correct. However, when it comes to memorization, trig seems pretty tame. That one mnemonic just about covers it all. Even multiplication tables seem like a larger memorization effort to me.

      • Lazz45@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        The reason they drill it in to the extent that they do is so that you have a foundational understanding of the underlying math on which to build new knowledge. If you show up in calc 1 in college without remembering even the basic concepts you were previously taught in things like trig…that can really bite you in the ass. My teacher LOVED pulling out classic substitutions for Secant, Cosecant, and cotangent (No, i didnt outright remember them from Trig, but I had seen them, and that made refreshing much easier). Also these concepts then form the basis of many other fields such as physics (electricity/magnetism, kinetic motion, optics, etc.), chemistry (quantum, MO theory, and things relating to the physics side of why chemistry occurs), and many of the graphing concepts used in engineering/stem only make sense if you have the foundational understanding of what integration/derivation are. Those stem from understanding how to graph complex functions by hand (like we did in trig) so that when you are doing it later with assistance, you still GRASP what is going on.

        Yes its not perfect, and yes for people who never need that later in life it can suck. However, I would make the argument it is better to have more of your population educated to a higher standard than what is needed in daily life, than to only give that to those who are aware enough at a young age to actively seek said education

        • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Personally once you got to the Cos Sin Tan and Log part of math in grade 11 and 12 no amount of practice ever improved my understanding of the underlying principles. Once most of the work gets done in the calculator or computer I just lost sense of what was happening in the background. It’s just turned into put number in calculator and get answer. But that’s probably just a failing of the local school systems methods or the individual teachers maybe.

          • Lazz45@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            There will be those that do and dont get the “nitty gritty” of the theory side of the math. Those people sometimes become math majors. Normal people (joking, dont be mad math majors), need more than simply the theory side of the math and actually need to see/perform the application side of things. I never once “understood” the lesson in math class when we go over the equations with variables only. I only truly began to learn the material and be able to use it once we got to the example problems. We would do multiple in class and then I would understand how to literally go through the problem and perform the math that was expected of me on the homework, and subsequently the test. There is tons of stuff i know how to use in math, but by no means understand WHY it came to be, or HOW its works for the realm of mathematics. I wanna know how this math can help me solve real life problems, problems I will face in industry, or even just a cool way to apply math in the real world. Not how it will be used in research to find new types of math we wont be able to apply for 70 years.

            It was pretty funny being in calculus in college. I was in a class with mostly engineers who were also taking the exact same weed out courses, and nearly every day after the professor would finish showing us the theory side of the lesson, hands would shoot up and the question of, “What application does this have in real life or engineering? Like, how will I actually use this?” always got asked. So not “loving” the theory is by no means uncommon (we all wished for an application focused version of the class to exist, for people like stem students who are not into the math theory lol), but I still see the value in having it presented so that you can have a more foundational understanding instead simply going through the motions