My lower res, lower DPI display from my old Dell laptop looks much more sharp and crisp than the fancy pants Framework 13 high res display.

  • pizzazz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Yeah totally the customer’s fault for wanting a nice display in friggin 2024, certainly not the software’s which still has no proper support for it.

    • jg1i@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Exactly! All I want is a nice display in 2024—and Framework chooses a garbage display with known issues.

  • Noxy@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    framework 16 over here, running hyprland, the only blurry fonts have been in Darktable, everything else is fine (telegram, discord, vscode, thunderbird, firefox, waybar, quodlibet, thunar, alacritty, seahorse, synology drive client…)

  • voxel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    your fault for using a DE/distro which can’t even handle fractional scaling

      • Abbrahan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Framework: let’s put a high resolution display in our laptop GNOME: oh shit I can’t handle more than 1080p correctly! Jg1i: Why would Framework do this?

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Mac OS has has this nailed down basically perfectly for over 10 years now, even windows has been great in the last 5+ years. Not having scaling done right in the age of 4k displays being cheap is a sin.

    • TheIllustrativeMan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Fractional scaling in Windows is still eh, largely because they can’t do a whole lot about icons not designed for that scale. For example in Rhino a bunch of the icons get weird pixel doubling when running 150% because they were designed for 100% and use a lot of 1 pixel wide elements.

      It’s honestly the main reason I keep hanging on to my now 10 and 15 year old displays. I’m hoping for a 6k 32" display so I can run true 200%. Dell makes one but they put a stupid webcam forehead on it.

  • XTL@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    Just like the teacher at school who kept turning all computers’ screen resolutions to 640x480 because the text was too small.