• e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Until I read a proper interpretation of the law by a lawyer, I will consider these just knee-jerk reactions by forum owners who can’t fathom being held responsible for the things their forum members post if they don’t moderate. There was similar hand-wringing when GDPR and Article 13 passed. Things are probably going to be fine.

    edit: After a bit of more research, shit like this is why small forums aren’t excluded.

    • 3 dogs in a trenchcoat@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Suicide forums are really a symptom of a much bigger issue about how we as a society talk about suicide. Banning them really won’t help

    • Daemon Silverstein@thelemmy.club
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I didn’t know that site until you mentioned it. Thanks for letting me know about its existence. It’s a cool example of Streisand effect in practice. (Not /s)

    • General_Effort@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      In all likelihood, it wouldn’t be enforced against small fry, but it may be. The fact is that running something like that costs time and money. If what you get in return is legal threats and more demands, maybe you just don’t bother anymore.

      What kind of future is there for flouting these laws? GDPR and Article 13 are rarely enforced against small fry, but they are. And all I see, even on lemmy, are demands for more laws and more enforcement. When somebody gets busted, it’s their own bloody fault for having ignored the law for years and being so recalcitrant.