• milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I disagree. The intelligence to understand the language is separate from the maturity to handle the content.

    And yes they’re seeing things on the internet… and shouldn’t be. That’s a long-standing debate in society about how heavily to shield them from it. But do you think the fact an 8 year-old might see awful things on tiktok means there’s no value in telling them to wait a few years before reading a book like 1984?

    • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      What 8-year-old is reading any Orwell? You’re talking about something that is probably an issue for .00001% of people at that age. Like 3 or 4 prodigies. So why do these bans which, again, do not differentiate between 7 and 17, need to be in place?

      Also, where are the parents of these 8-year-olds? Shouldn’t they be aware of what their child is getting from the library?

      • milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It sounds like we’re talking cross purposes now. I don’t know what children are reading Orwell. Not like in the comic, I imagine. For that matter, I hope most children are not, in fact, seeing videos of cats being killed.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Kids are seeing a hell of a lot more violent videos than they are reading Orwell. That was even true when I was a kid in the 80s. I saw every Nightmare on Elm Street and Friday the 13th movie that came out while I was in elementary school.

          Amazingly, it didn’t leave me horribly scarred.