• enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 days ago

    If your blockchain isn’t distributed, it doesn’t need to be a blockchain, because then you already have trust established.

    • Adalast@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      There are actually other comments on this thread that provide other benefits besides trust, like modification tracing. There is more to it than just trust.

      • enumerator4829@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        You mean a transparency log? Just sign and publish. Or if it’s confidential, have a timestamp authority sign it, but what’s the point of a confidential blockchain? Sure, we han have a string of hashes chained together á la git, but that’s just an implementation detail. Where does the trust come from, who does the audit? That’s the interesting part.

        • Adalast@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 days ago

          Obviously all good questions that those much more informed should weigh in on. I know just enough about blockchain to recognize reasonable vs scam uses for, but I also know enough to not Dunning Kruger the topic.