• Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Die apple. All your innovation and vision died with Steve Jobs, now you’re a shambling corpse infecting everything you touch. Just die, it’s time…

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        Oh yeah, render most of their already small software library incompatible for a 50% performance boost. It’s a sizable boost for sure, but not exactly looking at the big picture…

        • ndru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          But it didn’t though. Old apps work just fine. There are plenty of reasons to complain about Apple - but the way they changed architecture twice and did so with impressive backwards compatibility both times is not one of them.

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Officially, it didn’t, but actually it did. Officially it was the OS updates that made everything incompatible (and it did make more than half of my steam library incompatible) but it was those OS updates that were needed to support the new arm hardware.

            So look at it however you want I guess, but there are a bunch of 4-15 year old games that run just fine on my windows PC, but no longer launch on my iMac. That’s not impressive backwards compatibility.

    • oppy1984@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep crApple is the one pushing for the shorter SSL certificate length too. Their just adding headaches to everyone’s lives for no good reason.

        • Netrunner@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          Yeah and having a 512 character password is more secure than 52.

          This isn’t some big exploit vector they’re fixing, they’re trying to make it more annoying to automate a IoT stack without the cloud.

        • oppy1984@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I’m going on what I heard from Security Now but it is my understanding that apple was the only one pushing for this and the others just voted to approve even though apple was never able to present a convincing argument for why it needed to be shortened.

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    89
    ·
    2 days ago

    However, this U.S. court order is inconsistent with the Apple App Store business standards

    This is terrible writing. The court order is inconsistent with the Apple App Store business standards? No. The court ruled that Apple’s business practices were illegal.

    • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      USA’s press has a corporate bias, because you know, we need to care about the corporations, as if they had feelings, and not the exploitive entities that they are.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        This doesn’t seem to be the mainstream press, but a small tech blog. Mainstream American news outlets have been far more straightforward in their coverage of this case.

        Furthermore, this case was a fight between two large corporations; there’s no little guy here. Smaller developers may benefit from the outcome though.

  • skozzii@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I will never support Apple because of their anti-consuner practices.

  • Guidy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m never giving epic games a dime, I can assure you if that.

    This is one of those things many people seem to think will be a win but will actually suck once every app is able to charge you directly.

    • Auli@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Nothing we’ll convince me apple needs 30% for subscriptions purchased from iOS or IAP.

    • DomeGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      2 days ago

      There is no pattern of facts where “Apple gets to collect a tax on any transaction you make on your iPhone” is a good thing

    • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      what is wrong with app being able to charge you directly? Yes Epic is a greedy corporate entity like any other, but apple’s arbritary resctrions are comical and shouldn’t ever have existed, they outragous and outright ridiculous, there is a clear conflict of interest of an App store which in theory should try to attract apps with smaller cuts, but in case of Apple since they control both the OS and store they simply force a monopoly, so that they don’t need to improve their store, all corporate entities eventually tend towards monopolistic anti competitive behavior that restrict market freedom in a attempt to not need to compete, usually through exploitting their position in one field, like OS, to force a their subpar product of a different field onto consumers, like a shit app store, Apple does not want competition, they fear it, that’s why they use so many scummy anti competitive tactics, the entire idea of restricting an OS to only one source of apps is insane and monopolistic by nature.

      • Zak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m disappointed the court didn’t strike down the app store monopoly itself. The iPhone might actually appeal to me with unlimited sideloading.

        • furry toaster@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I wouldn’t settle for anything less than being able to jailbreak it, repair it, and sideload whatever I want as I please. Too bad critical thinking seems non existent, Apple’s business practices and of the whole big tech undermines the ideas and principles of any capitalists, yet those capitalists don’t even notice it, the double standards are impressive. It truly seems like a regression to feudal times

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Nobody forbids Apple from having a “vetted certified blessed” category where only apps that don’t are accepted. If you mean hygiene. If you mean that anal control from Apple is good, then I disagree.