Ok, yeah I can believe that. And if you’re using it for art printing, you may even be printing often enough that the feed lines don’t dry up and clog.
Personally, I like that with laser prints, if someone gets the paper wet, the toner doesn’t immediately run all over the page like with ink.
But again, less of an issue for art prints, as the results are more likely to be put in a frame than left out on a table where they can get splashed.
I feel like this is not rocket science here, this is like business 101.
Make the customer happy
Enjoy increased sales and revenue
You could if you want. But then again, remember that most people will be replacing that toner cartridge only once every 2-5 years. So it’s not like a major expense.
It depends on how much you print of course, like if you’re a teacher or something, you might print a lot.
Having been an IT guy for a very long time this is my recommendation to everyone. Buy a cheap laser printer for your home. Ink jet is garbage it will piss you off every time you want to print something, it’s a trap. Go with whatever brand you want, but brother is the one I’d recommend most
In my home I have a brother color laser printer, it may have run over $300, I don’t recall. But I don’t recall because I think I bought it 15 years ago and it still works just fine every time I need to print. No regrets.
What part of that phrase was confusing?
I mean, feel free to look up each word if you have to, there are only three of them…
Before it was cool!
Did anyone else see the humor in the way the question was asked?
“What would it mean”
Because you know, “meaning” is a concept that exists only within the context of awareness.
So if awareness were to disappear for whatever reason, there would suddenly be absolutely no meaning to anything, definitively.
Also, a side note, one could argue that evolution is entirely mistakes. Mutation and speciation, are a direct result of errors in DNA replication. Evolution can only happen as a result of mistakes.
Then it should be to hard for me to pay them.
Shit man…
You gotta love a good crowd-sourcing campaign.
Honestly I think Bethesda has always had the same problem. They have an unhealthy relationship with feature creep.
Sometimes if you love an idea, you have to let it go…
New laws in California and New York might stop people from 3D printing guns
It absolutely, positively, will not do that. If someone wants to print a gun, no legislation is going to stop them. It could at best, slow them down by maybe an hour, as they find, download and install different firmware for their printer.
If you want to prevent people from printing guns, you’ll need a different tactic, because that won’t do it.
You need that leg enhancement.
It’s the only way to play the game. If you played all the way through without trying this, all I can say is you missed out.
With the jump and the air dash you will be an unstoppable melee demon. And it will be fun.
I don’t think that’s accurate to say at all. If anything, our current climate crisis points out that there are potentially multiple ways that we are nearing population limits. Sure, we could move to cleaner energy and prevent population growth from impacting the planet, but we aren’t doing that, not fast enough.
We keep using more and more land for farming, and that often means destroying existing habitats, which has a real ecological cost. We could prevent the destruction of more habitats with advances in vertical farming, but generally speaking, those methods require more energy and have larger carbon footprints.
And ultimately, even if agricultural techniques keep up, there are simply other limits. For instance, you can’t just generate more energy forever. Even with a mastery of fusion power, making free energy out of water, at some point the generation and use of energy heats the planet too much directly. You don’t reach that point until your generating energy for trillions of people, but that’s a hard limit, boiling the planet is not an option.
Unlikely.
We are eventually going to hit a real limit on the number of humans this planet can support. Whether or not we’ll get there, that’s not really in question. When we’ll reach that point, that’s harder to say, could be 5000 years, but I’d bet it’s closer to 500. At some point, relatively soon, we are going to need to start expanding into near space, the moon, earth orbit.
It would be the same for any intelligent species. They start their existence in relative equilibrium, until they start outperforming other species, they shape the world to fit their needs, they invent machines, medicine, and then they are no longer in equilibrium, their numbers are steadily increasing. Any intelligent species will eventually be more successful than their planet can support.
But if a star system were surrounded by a Dyson Swarm, millions or even billions of free floating habitats and space stations orbiting the star, that’s actually something we could detect. We know that isn’t happening all over the galaxy, because we actually probably wouldn’t miss that.
Yeah, that’s fair. I don’t really have my finger on the pulse of AI tech, but llama was a thing I remembered.
Well they’re developing llama I believe. Which (credit where credit is due), is one of the few open source gpl language models. And you can run it locally, without imposed limits or sending tons of data off to Meta servers.
They can call it whatever they want, the bottom line is that a human is behind the wheel and ultimately they’re responsible.
And I think it has been well established at this point that fsd isn’t ready yet, that it’s not safe. The fact that they call it “full self driving” is cute… but it’s marketing, it’s not a get out of jail free card.
Edit: Hah. So many down votes! Well go ahead, down vote personal responsibility! I mean, suggesting maybe people are responsible for the choices they make, fuck me right!
*Tim Apple
Truly a horrifying read. As a parent of a tween, I don’t think I could be more worried. This is going to suck.