Do that all you want, there’s not going to be enough money (nor would it be ecologically sound) to create a robust public transportation system in every small Nebraska town.
I’m not saying it’s a bad idea, it’s just that it’s only part of a solution.
Researchers are combining the best attributes from each microbe to engineer enzymes that can convert CO2 from coal-fired power plant emissions into calcium carbonate—a mineral that can later be sold as a concrete additive or for other industrial purposes.
Gotta be honest, that’s pretty slick. Making concrete is one of the biggest culprits when it comes to adding CO2 to the atmosphere. Concrete has a very high carbon footprint. If we can find a way to make concrete carbon neutral, or even carbon negative… That would be truly transformative.
Yes, those are both valid solutions.
However, in some cities public transit isn’t very good, there aren’t enough lines to actually get you where you need to go consistently. Outside of cities, public transit is mostly non-existent, so you need something else. Taxis can work, but they’re also expensive and you have to rely on others, which can also be anxiety inducing. What if my taxi doesn’t show up, or shows up late? What if the taxi driver makes me feel unsafe? I expect some people would like to be more in control of the situation, just without having to actually drive.
Hey, these things may not apply to you, and that’s fine, I’m glad there are simpler solutions for most people. But having used public transit every day for many years, I can honestly say that while it is usually the cheapest and most efficient solution, I can still understand why people might want something else.
And yet I still know people who are just so chuffed about “never having to drive again.”
I mean, I think that part is 100% understandable. I get that many people in fact enjoy driving, but likewise, many people do not. For many a driving commute is the most anxiety inducing part of their day, and they’d be happy to be rid of it.
That’s the promise that self driving cars present. They just aren’t actually capable enough yet. From what I gather though, waymo is probably the farthest along of any of these companies. I don’t think I’d trust them for complicated Boston area driving though. To many narrow, winding roads complete with active road work, aggressive drivers, rotaries, etc…
That said, metacritic and Opencritic Gave Mina the same score. So… Regardless of where you look, the outcome is essentially the same.
Yeah, a general understanding is enough. But I think yeah, actually skim over the code, at least get a basic idea about how the internal methods work. Depending on what you’re using the library for, it could be prudent to know more about how data structures are handled.
Honestly, you’ll probably learn something in the process.
Maybe if instead of pegs they used little wheels you could turn revealing 1 color at a time. Everything built in, no parts to lose.
Think of the game “guess who”, you just flip the portraits down, but they stay attached, that’s the design philosophy to match.
Also, there are definitely mastermind mobile games. I actually really like a deductive mobile game called “crossme”.
That’s fair, I made an assumption there. I’ll just delete the comment.
deleted by creator
Seriously, that’s is the actual alternative. It’s not theoretical - people are definitely buying (and they pay better).
Has Microsoft forgotten why they do these bug bounties? This is why. Because if they don’t pay, other people will. They’re actively turning the white hats into grey and black hats, selling to intelligence agencies and criminals instead of responsible disclosing.
This is on them.
I don’t like to use libraries I don’t understand. Probably part why I’m not a professional developer, but it’s the principle of the thing - don’t put out code you can’t vouch for.
I mean, yes, it’s way easier to just use the library, trust it works; but by that logic, it’s also way easier to just let an llm code for you.
Well, I think it’s legit to use software without understanding the code or use hardware without understanding the specifics of the logical mechanisms of the silicon. But when you’re writing software, you really should know what’s in your own code. Anything else is bad form in my opinion.
the Java developer said that Anthropic’s Claude AI code tool flagged the malicious instruction without following it.
Darn. So how do you beat Claude these days?
Well it did a simulated landing in the sea. (And then exploded)
We know that was the plan all along and that it landed on target because there was a camera buoy sitting in the ocean waiting to record the landing. Which it did.
Yeah they blew an engine, but that’s kinda what redundancy is all about.
Do you know how many times the Saturn V had to make early shutdowns on one of its engines? It’s easier to say how many times it didn’t have early shutdowns: 0. On every single launch they had to shut off at least 1 engine early as the combustion became unstable; this is just part of the game.
Oh yeah, I mean all of the wind’s energy comes from solar heating. If you want to point a finger, it’s the sun’s fault.
I mean that’s not super helpful, but that is definitely the source of the energy.
Yep, it looks like that new much larger downcomer may really be the thing to thank, now they can actually feed all those engines fast enough.
Nice, yeah that’s basically what I thought.
And yeah, I agree, what you do with those instructions is the tricky part.
Pulling out is super easy. Just don’t release a compromised version of the app. Done.
If the app in its current form doesn’t comply with Canadian law, then the play store can’t legally distribute it. So, problem solved.
So basically Signal can pull out of Canada by doing nothing different than they’re already doing.
As for the users who already have the app installed, well that’s just too bad for the Canadian government isn’t it.
Yeah they also lost a sea level raptor on the booster towards the end of the accent. That’s honestly not a big deal, losing 1/28 engines at a point in the flight when they’re already probably throttling down a bunch.
But still, they’ve got some kinks to work out with the raptor 3.
That said, did you see how much faster it left the launch pad? They’ve seriously increased the thrust with these new raptors.
Do you have a problem with cars in general? Because I really don’t see anything inherently worse about a car you don’t have to operate manually, that’s just a technical achievement.
I agree that whenever it’s feasible public transportation is a better option than individual vehicles, no argument there. But, it’s also not always feasible.
I don’t know how fascism factors in besides perhaps a tangential connection to Elon musk. I think this is really more of an ecological and economical issue than an ideological one.