§ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝘭ⱺɠịᵴŧ@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoMusk's Takeover of Twitter Is More Problematic Than You Thinkwww.commondreams.orgexternal-linkmessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up117arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up116arrow-down1external-linkMusk's Takeover of Twitter Is More Problematic Than You Thinkwww.commondreams.org§ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝘭ⱺɠịᵴŧ@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square7fedilinkfile-text
“Beyond Musk’s oft-repeated rants about free speech may lie shadier plans to recoup the $44bn he paid for the site.”
minus-square§ɦṛɛɗɗịɛ ßịⱺ𝘭ⱺɠịᵴŧ@lemmy.mlOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoWhy do you think thats his end goal, a tax write off?
minus-squarem-p{3} ⛔@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·edit-22 years agoThat, and to have more power to fundamentally alter it.
minus-squarerhymeswithjazz@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 years agoMaybe burn it to the ground and then relaunch after a complete rebuild around what he wants.
minus-squareMad@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agowhy not just make a separate platform then. he doesn’t get the legitamacy, established name or running infrastructure of twitter if he reboots it. best he’d get is the accounts, but if none of those are logged into again what are they good for?
Why do you think thats his end goal, a tax write off?
That, and to have more power to fundamentally alter it.
Maybe burn it to the ground and then relaunch after a complete rebuild around what he wants.
why not just make a separate platform then. he doesn’t get the legitamacy, established name or running infrastructure of twitter if he reboots it. best he’d get is the accounts, but if none of those are logged into again what are they good for?