If not, we could say the same for Telegram and Protonmail which are not.
And it is worse when they just donβt say it in the general way but they say βmail providerβ impliying that is their service Open Source itself which is the main part being non-FLOSS.
this is where an asterisk would come in handy, I guessβ¦ An βour web client is open source but our backend is notβ probably wouldnβt work either, since itβs lengthy
πππππππππππππππππππππππππππ
why so much laugh?
Because it is a big lie.
How? Their clients are open source.
That doesnβt make it Open Source.
If not, we could say the same for Telegram and Protonmail which are not.
And it is worse when they just donβt say it in the general way but they say βmail providerβ impliying that is their service Open Source itself which is the main part being non-FLOSS.
All true and very misleading, they couldβve just stated βopen source mail clientββ¦ Forgot to adjust the description accordingly
But if Tutanota states open source mail client, people will think Tutanota is some sort of email application like K-9 Mail or Thunderbird.
We should get in touch with them and tell them to change the description to something else which is not misleading.
this is where an asterisk would come in handy, I guessβ¦ An βour web client is open source but our backend is notβ probably wouldnβt work either, since itβs lengthy
Ok. Yeah, that makes sense.
Tutanota is a great client :)