I’m pretty sure ze’s (accurately) talking about how many of the enacted age verification régimes only mandate it for platforms with certain amounts of monthly active users.

that iirc lasted just some dozen minutes after initially being listed. that day it closed at $160. it’s the closing price that matters

and even if we compare against that, that’s just <42% off.

70% off

doesn’t seem to be true? lowest recently was 132.15 which is less than 23% off the peak of 170.86. and that wasn’t even a closing price; by the day’s end it was back above 135 and the stock has never closed below 135.

Link: “Like guarantees of future returns, this page doesn’t exist.”

this article sounds like AI too, i am going crazy

(the colors are whether and how much the stock rose, not credit rating)

yahoo news is not a news source but a site that republishes articles from other websites. you can tell from the top here that this is the exactly same article from Gadget Review

apparently the 404media part is just a part of the article where it cites previous incidents. so then we don’t even have a source for the meat of the article save a random X thread.

that’s not a summary; that’s the first paragraphs of the article

(CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0, the non–open-source part here being NC)

obviously LLM-generated article from an odd outlet that publishes five articles every hour

the news is real because it just regurgitates 404media

ICE wasn’t created, only transferred and renamed from the Immigration and Naturalization Service from the Treasury. There had to be an agency enforcing the era where we used a fucking ocean instead of the fucking wall. (There was a prosperous time of much freer immigration in between but my point is of course it was always a thing.) Finally, of course, ICE never and never intended to barge into cities and homes under the Bush like Trump did, nor did he forever change politics for the worse and blow up education and welfare and economic equality like Reagan did.

Could you source what you said about the PATRIOT Act’s sunset provisions?

technically the provisions that made it infamous had dates of expiry, weren’t extended, and are thus no longer in effect

Fair point.

I think Bush was bad but a lot of the bad stuff he did was somewhat reversible (ICE existed , plus it’s not his fault that ICE is now used as a papers-please. There was PATRIOT but we reversed it so it’s actually a great example of what I mean.) and relatively short-term. Reagan, meanwhile, made a giant hole in the infrastructure that is still ingrained within everything US today.

“As 4Chan has no assets in the United Kingdom (given that it has no connection to the United Kingdom), that would require you to show up in a US court as a platiff, waive soreign immunity, and overcome existing U.S. doctrine regarding the non-enforcement of foreign regulatory penalties.

—article!

said pretty-much-every terrorist attacks also involved “the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciate act”, no?

what was al-qaeda mostly funding then

they’re trying to compete with Renault’s handsome EV designs

why is guy being bullied for writing what all can understand

I would expect them to be confused and suspicious of the term “surplus labor value”. If not, then education has a problem.