Well that’s what you think, he’s actually just been in hiding in a cave in northern Kazakhstan to escape all that public attention. And now he’s on Lemmy because he did actually get a little lonely.

My mind is a funny place.

But it turns out you are actually Andre the Giant, so you can throw them very far and thus trust them a lot.

I mean how often do you install AUR packages? Usually takes like a minute or so to skim through PKGbuild and the pkg comments and look for obvious issues. And most updates are just a sha hash and version change, taking like 5s to check.

You said the literal opposite of what you later explained. “Always toward the center” = direction does not change.

I don’t understand the question, you seem to already know it if you can do it for men. Just do the same.

Of course not. If I grieved every person’s death, I would be constantly grieving.

Yes, I do have empathy for sick old humans. I wish Trump was safe in a nursing home or wherever, wouldn’t feel the need for constant validation and would feel loved. He’s quite obviously got massive internal struggles that make him do terrible things to feel less terrible himself, if he was doing better, I’m sure he wouldn’t do any of the things he’s doing and likely wouldn’t be president or similar.

No, why? I do not grieve for most of people’s deaths.

The funny thing about this headline is, human brains are neural networks, so the last sentence could also say

“Soon, neural networks could out think neural networks.”

It’s not about respect for his actions, of course they’re terrible, it’s about respect for a human being suffering. There is no real point to wish suffering on anyone, other’s suffering never helped anything except satisfy one’s vengeful fantasies/sadism. If someone is hurting others, you make them stop hurting others, but you still give them basic human respect, i.e. don’t make them suffer needlessly etc

People that are able to say stuff like this are exactly why we have the situation we’re having. If you can turn off your empathy for the “bad guys”, all it takes is just misidentifying the “bad guys” once, either by mistake or on purpose or by being manipulated.

Even serial killers or mass murders deserve some basic respect. You got to deal with them appropriately so they can’t be a threat anymore, but once that’s done, the respect should be the same as for anyone else.

I wouldn’t be surprised if this was an attempt at marketing the game, lol

As an extension to this, many games use interpreted languages, essentially another language before it gets made into machine language, which makes decompilation much more easy and readable since you’re already working with a higher level programming interface.

Mostly with Unity games or games that use lua scripting.

The other answers have already been helpful, so I wanted to ask, why do you have/want a video collection? Can’t you just delete it and download it again once you want to watch it again?

If it’s open source, there’s roughly a 100% chance someone will make it work on Linux.

I think it’s just sheltered people that didn’t (/weren’t forced to) discover all the possible evil in human behavior.

Lots of people grow up in a decent environment, without many major problems. If that is the case, it is very psychologically disadvantageous to become aware of all the evil possible by literally everybody, because this realization is extremely painful.

Ignorance is bliss and so on. Active, willful ignorance works just as well because our mind is so good at compartmentalizing. People like this can actually unconsciously be actively ignorant, because even the action of trying to be ignorant can be ignored successfully, that’s how “good” at that the human mind is.

Because of that, in my opinion, your kind of comment is a little unhelpful. You’re entirely right of course, but you phrased it relatively aggressive/as if it was completely obvious, as if you think people that don’t believe that should feel bad. But I think the correct approach is to point your message out in a neutral/compassionate way, to make it easier for these ignorant people to read and feel less psychological pain, triggering less of the mental defenses. In any case though, I personally appreciate you :)

it goes against his own initial intention

It goes against his initial stated intention.

Just because he said something doesn’t mean it’s the truth. The way he acted about it initially and the way he acts now makes it blatantly obvious that his actual initial intentions were always nefarious, and he simply lied about his intentions to get sympathy like you’re giving him.

By that logic, everyone is extremely stupid, since it’s impossible to know everything. It’s actually impossible to be intelligent.

I guess I’m the 0/10 case then

Meh, the article mostly argues semantics. Sure “intellectual property” is a loaded phrase, but what is meant by the layperson is just “I made it, I should profit from it”, i.e. copyright. We’re not talking about massive corporations here and hindering right-to-repair, I’m talking to a guy who made something useful (likely software or music or whatever creative) and wants to sell it.

I agree that talking about it vaguely is not super useful, but this is just a small casual discussion forum, not some legal debate.