Well in the 90s in Eater Europe we first had cable TV without subs or dub, just the original track (English, German, Italian, Spanish) so we had to learn the language just watching the shows trying to understand. Then subs started to be common and almost no dub. Then in late 2000s dubing started to be the norm for animations but movies are still subed and nobody likes dubed movies.

I think in the context of the Black Sea fleet it’s considered major. They cannot replace them so every ship counts especially missile carrying ones.

Why split them up?

"Rockets are still being fired from Gaza into Israel, and we condemn this,” he adds.

Truth be told he hasn’t got an original ideea since … Ok I don’t think he has got past that point yet.

Icm confident that until next year he will do it /s

Yeah, we are so much better than them because … (insert own reason of entitlement)!

classic phrase repeated each generation since recorded history

Wait, isn’t X that app that evolved thorough multiple stages never reachig any just drowning in it’s own puss? Free speech platform -> all round financial app -> dating app -> future bullshit this conman can spew?

Ohhhh man …

What if their “art” is actually and utterly a pile of steaming shit?

Now, It’s true, they can’t. Before they attacked Israel I believe they could.

The link is not working anymore, but reading the headline: as a father I would take my kids and get the fuck out of there! I can understand the motivation and fight for whatever rights, lands, religion but knowingly involving kids is unacceptable.

Unfortunately, you don’t understand the basics of living in a society. Please stop being arrogant and don’t assume you have an opinion worth listening to.

Hey, you cannot say that here! It doesn’t fit the general narrative. What are you thinking? /s

612mb for homework in the 90s 😆

… we used analog format for homework back then! Our tools were mare out of chopped procesed wood and coal! 😜😁

Thank you for your reply. It’s simple:

• if they have Australian citizenship (I think in 67 was a push for this) then they already have all the Constitutional rights and obligations like every other Australian citizen. Why are these extra steps necessary?

• if they don’t: what is their current legal status? Why not just give them citizenship and thus having the right of representation in the Parliament and so forth?

Ok, thank you for your patience.

But aren’t Aboriginal people citizens of Australia and so already part of the Constitution thus having legal rights like everyone else? What are the extra rights and representation needed?

New to the subject here: why is it a desirable thing to recognise Aboriginal people in the Constitution?

As I read through the article in the Aboriginal camp not everyone wants this. So I’m puzzled.

Ok, then maybe I’m at fault and I didn’t understand what you were trying to say.

Ohhhh, we’re discussing hypotheticals, sorry I thought you were serious.

Because then for sure you would have taken in consideration that religious affiliation, nationality and branding are pretty different things. The level of psychological involvement and the way these elements interact and define ones individual structure is quite incomparable. Usually for religious people (especially fundamenlists) religion does define their personal values, morality an so on. This IS the purpose of religion after all.

And then of course you would have taken in consideration that this is a conflict with mainly a religious conflict. Although you can say palestinians fight mainly for their land the other Muslim countries that support them have also religious motives.

And of course it’s a fact that they didn’t choose to take another religious affiliation or as you say a different brand.