Politica Pirata: informazione su #whistleblowing #dirittidigitali #sovranitàdigitale #copyright #privacy #cyberwarfare #pirati #Europa #opensource #opendata https://www.informapirata.it/
I remind you that mastodon users can overcome the serious problem of not being able to view Lemmy communities in an orderly manner. The Raccoon for Friendica app, compatible with Mastodon, provides simplified viewing (viewing only topics) for all accounts of the Lemmy community, Friendica group or Gup.pe group type
Yes, it happens to me too
When you write from Friendica (or another social network) to post on Lemmy, you must respect some basic rules.
Here I tried to write a handbook (in Italian) to help users write posts that have a readable title and work well
Furthermore, as regards the titles, you must take into account that Lemmy only interprets up to 200 characters; when exceeding 200 characters, the title is truncated. To count the characters, however, you have to consider the BBCode characters of the source text, which are converted into Markdown in Lemmy. So you have to be careful that “marked” text strings don’t end up at the 200th character! Here are some additional notes:
Yes, these are accounts of the same friendica instance managed with the same privacy policies and which always respond to the first post lemmy
I think I understand the problem: it is not a question of federation, but a problem related to the “type of account” in Friendica
I did four tests from four accounts I own, all from the same friendica instance (poliverso.org):
4) NOK from an “organization” type account: https://poliverso.org/display/0477a01e-1462-4de8-65bd-587299275161
It seems clear to me therefore that the problem lies in the fact that Lemmy accepts messages from the first three types, but not from an organization page. I hazard a guess (but I’m not a technician): is it possible that the “organization” account type in friendica corresponds to a lemmy account type that is not compatible with the answers (perhaps it corresponds to the “community” lemmy account type)?
You were right to remember, thanks, but the problem in question concerned the response from a Friendica user to a post published by a Lemmy user; and not the publication of a new Lemmy post by a Friendica user.
Certainly. In any case, the Poliverse instance and the polli.social instance are both updated to the latest version released.
deleted by creator
The plugin is great and with mastodon and misskey it works great. If the blog comments are closed, in some cases it is not enough to approve, but you must approve the comment by making any changes to it (from the wordpress moderation panel).
Personally I encountered a problem with Friendica: since Friendica has native support for following RSS / ATOM feeds, it seems that the RSS protocol prevails over the wordpress / activitypub one. I don’t know how this can be resolved …
The only sore point is this: I would like to point out that, with this plugin, a private/direct message is not reported in a particular way and therefore, once published, it loses its privacy attributes. Also, if the user deletes the message, the unsubscribe message is not accepted by the plugin and the message still remains crystallized for eternity in the form of a comment in the WordPress blog. This of course happens even if the message is a direct message, therefore the highest standard level of confidentiality existing today in the social networks of the fediverse. Having said that, for a principle of caution related to privacy, I will disable the plugin pending further changes; however I believe that the activitypub for wordpress plugin is a beautiful project and that it deserves further development and possibly further financial support; in fact, the path taken is good and contributes to making the web more beautiful and similar to the decentralized spirit of the origins
The term metaverse is earlier, although it is at least suspicious that the metaverse was launched just at the moment when Trump’s “truth” project granted great notoriety to mastodon and all other federated platforms.
In my opinion, this is not a contingent consequence, but the problem is a bit deeper: Mastodon staff knows well that helping Mastodon users to use groups better (for example by helping them to visualize them better) means helping competing projects like Friendica, Lemmy, Mbin, Piefed, gup.pe and even Peertube (which also works as a synolos between user (author) and group (channel). Helping the rest of the Fediverse means giving up the dominant leadership position that guarantees them subsidies, donations, visibility and, above all, the possibility to do whatever the fuck they want, imposing de facto standards.
Distribution of active users in the Fediverse (source: fedidb.org - 12/2024)
PS: this is why I am a supporter of Friendica, Lemmy/Piefed, Wordpress, Mbin, Peertube and Bonfire: because virtuous competition brings diversity and diversity brings resilience