Nerco-ing a bit:

Can you provide me of an example that is objectively good?

Please don’t describe it, simply provide an example.

That’s definitely elder millennial.

Add peanut butter.

So anyway, I started blasting.

Not enough recursion, at all.

Too much of a good thing.

Both are consistent within the confines of the definition.

Literally nothing is “good of its own merit”. Because literally nothing is intrinsically “good”.

“Good” is a subjective idea, not objectively measurable, so it will always be in reference to another, i.e. relative.

Could you fill this in for me, please?

https://links.rocks/pictrs/image/93f268f2-d608-4e94-86a8-680cb8c9249c.jpeg

Help get rid of First Past the Post voting, and your dream might become closer to a reality.

Thing is, you need to be able to compromise somewhat, when it comes to politics. And many aren’t ready for that.

After we get rid of First Past the Post voting.

Good is relative. And relatively speaking, one is definitely good compared to the other.

You can always try to take 1 class per semester. If that’s not manageable, then you might need to refocus.

Multiple tabs, or multiple windows

Citations?

Remembered*

Bill DID forget.

Being a small town business doesn’t automatically make you a saint. They still need to follow the rules they signed up for.

And two things can be bad at once.

You can remove it from the board and try again. The rules of the game do not dictate that which is outside of the game.

The one upside?

You can start a “new game” with someone else. And you don’t have to put the knight in the middle.

Sure, you still don’t have many options, but each “new game” provides opportunity, despite the limitations.

Report to the FTC.