

CEO proves that CEOs can be replaced by AI.
Profile pic is from Jason Box, depicting a projection of Arctic warming to the year 2100 based on current trends.


CEO proves that CEOs can be replaced by AI.


Punching a nazi in the crowded streets so much better than in the alley. Tell them we don’t want them here, period.
“This is cyberterrorism.” Letting those sites do their thing without cracking down on them… I agree.


That or the price of advancement has made things impossible to fix without swapping out entire components or just get a new one. Which has been taken advantage of by making things fail a lot sooner. So much easier to make it cheaper so it gets replaced, and it keeps the company in business and is more profitable.


The rhetoric, absolutely. The difference is that this idiot has a big, loaded gun that works.


Totally not a threat on on the life of another country’s official. Nope.


Or you have the bit rate high enough so you only max it out at the inner song and just don’t need it at the start.
There’s a lot pumped into a single groove, based on video on how stereo works on vinyl.


We need like a united nations organization to help push back on the aggressor. Like a league of nations or something.
First one that came to mind was one I have an actual newspaper clipping of. Can’t find it online. It’s an image of the Iwo Jima Memorial, but they’re pushing up a gas gauge from Empty.
That’s assuming Copilot could form a coherent report to send back to them.


Windows 10 was the last Windows I’ll use. Windows 7 was the last one I was happy with. Windows 98SE and XP, we had great times, didn’t we? Miss you guys.


House dust is up to 50% human skin particles. You’re breathing in all sorts of crap, and outside I’m sure there’s loads more including animal crap.
You’re including a great list of things we have or do have to look into to solve before space is trivial. You’re omitting a lot of the problems of underwater, or even above water colonies. I do agree that colonization of space comes only if we can make it self-sufficient, as getting all the resources from a gravity well makes it ridiculously costly and limited. I disagree on how any of the problems have no solutions though, as they’ve been discussed even before I was born, and I’m old. 🫤
Will humans change by necessity and by exposure? Of course they will. The Expanse did a good job of suggesting early changes to those living in low gravity conditions (which is probably the biggest thing to solve, not radiation or material sources). And after even longer they will change even more, making the different places become subsets of the species as we diverge.
Thanks for the link, I could not remember where that site was from so long ago, but it’s a great collection of lore and speculative ideas.
We just disagree on what can be done. I can’t imagine the scifi visions of underwater places that ignore how a small crack leads to instant crushing, or the constant corrosion that has to be fought against. On the Moon and Mars we’ve got the dust that is still a questionable thing on how to handle (electrostatic charges were the last I saw that seemed like they may help some). If you don’t have to rely on Earth for most supplies and you find ways to counter radiation (a few meters of slag works, not practical for a ship due to the mass, but a station isn’t a problem). Rotation may solve a lot of the problems with zero G, but we need to do more research on site before we can just accept it’s unsolvable.
It may not matter and we may not be around that long for it to be a factor anyway, but assuming we are, we have to move on from the Earth, as the window of habitability is not that long. Huge for us at human scales, but cosmically we’re way past the halfway point.
Your list of other places to colonize are easier than a difference of one atmosphere and controllable environment? That’s funny. I never implied it would be easy, I said the opposite, and getting into space is a big part of that. And there are dangers to figure out. But a hull leak in space is far safer than even a few hundred meters under water.
Maybe. We never got far enough to really test the waters that much. I think that it’s more possible than flying cars or living on Mars, but it would take huge effort, and my opinion is the window of opportunity is all but shut now. But why should we? If for no other reason than because of the “eggs in one basket” metaphor. Even past climate change and impacts, this Sun won’t last forever, and if we don’t find ways to move on, all life that we know of is gone.
Maybe that doesn’t matter in the end, after all the universe also ends some way too. I think even if life is everywhere, it’s all unique, and so are we, good and bad. But we obviously don’t treasure what we have much, and maybe it’s better we don’t spread the same bad we do to Earth and ourselves elsewhere. It’s possible we simply advanced before we were mature enough to understand what we could stand to lose.
Flying cars was a scifi delusion that didn’t consider all the problems that come with it. What would be a more rational “this was predicted and never came about” would be social constructs like safety nets and betterment of society for all, as well as improving our management and use of the Earth. That should make us mad, not that we don’t have flying cars buzzing (and falling) in the sky.
It just hit me that we did for flying what we should have done for ground. Make it almost all mass transit.


That’s 2.5B with 80 views a day, or 1.25 with 160 a day. Sadly those numbers aren’t that unbelievable the way people consume short media. Just average it out so some make up for others only watching a few.


And depending on your refrigerator’s settings and insulation, the door compartments may be cold enough for more stable things but not for things like milk. Too me a bit to figure out having the milk in the door was both convenient and cutting its lifetime down a lot. Only takes a few degrees, plus the large door shelf is usually higher up, where the warmer air is.


You’re probably right, as that is the tendency of most people, to not have to go outside a comfort zone. It’s also assuming that’s true, and for all you know people who are stating this very thing might also be trying to do local action and failing because they’re alone. So rather than put someone down for asking a valid question, we could explore why people aren’t doing much of anything overall, and what can be done to change that outside of things getting far worse (which they will, as they have before).
Not when the Moon is out but it’s the middle of the night.
But galactic-scale speaking, yeah, they’re right next to each other.
Copying an old Waterfox logo. They really are going downhill.