Nothing at all.

We’re entering a low trust era. I suspect there’s going to be less sharing and collaboration. Between dealing with entitlement, harassment of devs, slop code PRs etc…what incentive do FOSS devs have to share anything?

We’re going to see siloing on one end and people using AI on the other to make their own shit for themselves. Everything else in the middle will be a no man’s land.

Big tech was already hoarding, FOSS was already under pressure from VC-backed “open core” bait-and-switch models, and maintainer burnout was already a crisis. Now we get to deal with the FuckAI crowd asking “papers please” every 5 mins too?

Thanks, but no thanks. I’ll make for me and mine or if you pay. No good deed goes unpunished.

More like market driven perverse incentivization.

Ethics is the study of oughts. Law is the floor. Nobody said legal = acceptable. I said the copyright destruction mechanism is worth understanding before using it as a rhetorical grenade.

Cheers big ears.

Tilted? Hell no, I’m having a blast :)

But serious discussion about AI - on Lemmy? The famously fair and even-handed Lemmy? Where a single thread had people calling others morons and accusing them of being anally puppeteered by Claude Code?

Nah.

We tried the substantive utilitarianism debate downstream.

Some people do

No, not at all. There’s some really good shit written in Rust.

“Written in Rust” as a slop indicator is like an AI scanner flagging a repo as AI-coded. Poor heuristic, infinite false positives. Which circles back to: if professional devs can’t tell the difference between AI-written and human-written Rust, the FuckAI crowd needs to rethink what “slop” actually means.

Or we need to admit that Rust is just…fucked :)

Nothing at all. OP just wants to hang shit on people using Rust because OP has an axe to grind against AI - which, given half a chance, will elect to code in Rust (as it’s a well documented language). Therefore, Rust = sign of AI slop. (See downstream for their comments.

Rust is a fine language. Python is a fine language. OP needs a hug, some weed and BJ.

Do you? Pressing X to doubt, champ. Pressing X to doubt.

Quick - to wikipedia!

On this end, you responded to an upstream post - federation does weird things to comment threading.

As for the 2nd meme: I posted it. I’m Gus. You just accidentally complimented my methodology and insulted yourself. Do you need me to type more s-l-o-w-l-y?

I understand. It’s a deeply weird thread.

We’re on Lemmy, boss. We should probably be working instead of shitposting on communist Reddit

Bold of you to call me a clown from inside the circus.

Beratna, you’re agreeing with me. Did you reply to the right comment?

Kowlting da forata, beratna.

PS: Im pensa na Claude fo da.

If it quacks like a duck etc etc.

I mean…if the meatbags can’t get it right, what chance do the poor clankers have.

Wah wah wah. Still no argument, tho.

Play the game not the man, champ.

TTFN!

Have…have we considered that 1) Rust is shitty 2) LLMs learned to code from shitty Rust coders?

Proud? Nah. Bemused, sure.

You hit Wikipedia and looked up utilitarianism. Cool.

Utilitarianism requires weighing all affected parties, not just the ones harmed. AI-assisted diagnosis in underserved regions. Accessibility tools for people who can’t afford specialists. Climate modelling. Translation breaking language barriers. Medical research leading to a Nobel Prize in Medicine.

“Can’t name a single good thing” isn’t a utilitarian argument. It’s vibes. And it’s prima facie untrue. There’s not much point in citing counter-examples because you’ve already made your mind up. Cf. your post history on Fuck AI.

The warfare point is a military policy conversation, not a ChatGPT one.

The art and skill atrophy concerns are legit. But that’s a “how do we manage this” conversation, not “therefore unethical.”

Note by the way I haven’t personally attacked you or accused you of having Claude’s arm up YOUR ass? That’s called an ad-hominem - look that up in your next wikipedia search.

Swing and a miss.

Checking post history to see who I’m talking to is called due diligence, champ. You have sadder shit in your profile that I did you the courtesy of not quoting because it’s not relevant to the topic at hand.

Removed by mod