

I agree, but bracing for isn’t the same as shitting on


I agree, but bracing for isn’t the same as shitting on


Neckbeard and incel aren’t circular intersections. Of course, there’re people who’re both, but ther’re plenty of incels who have nothing to do with neckbeard stuff and vice versa. If you take the school shooter stereotype, you’re almost exclusively in self conceived alpha male territory.


Forgot about him. Fair enough. /thread


Not sure where this is coming from, lol Giving pot and kettle vibes though


Neither


As with all things arch based: void better
I use an fzf based script that queries for updates and lets me choose what to install.
If you use xbps, or are just curious:
::: xu #!/bin/env sh
self=“$(basename “$0”)”
error() { printf ‘%s:’ “$self” >&2 # shellcheck disable=SC2068 printf ’ %s’ $@ >&2 printf ‘\n’ >&2 }
fatal() { error “$@” exit 1 }
if [ -x “$(command -v sk)” ]; then finder=sk elif [ -x “$(command -v fzf)” ]; then finder=fzf else echo “neither fzf or sk are installed” >&2 exit 1 fi
tmp=“$(mktemp)” || fatal “couldn’t source bindings” grep ‘^export’ “$DOTFILES/.zshenv” | grep -E ‘FZF|SKIM’ >“$tmp” . “$tmp” rm “$tmp”
choices=“$(xbps-install -nSu | cut -f1 -d’ ’ | sed ‘s/-[^-]*$//g’ | $finder | tr ‘\n’ ’ ')”
[ -n “$choices” ] || exit
guard=pkexec command -v “$guard” >/dev/null 2>/dev/null || guard=sudo
while ! $guard xbps-install -Syu $choices; do :; done
:::


The concern isn’t that corporations deserve protection. It’s that as thesr platforms gain notoriety, those corporations lash out and force them to cease operation, which is fundamentally inconvenient to pirates.


Can anybody break this one down for an idiot like me?
Expressiveness isn’t the problem. No doubt it can be less efficient and re-usable but constructed languages are mostly syntactical interfaces to subsets of the semantics we express in natural languages all the time. By using them we can precisely express combinations that can be difficult to convey in natural languages without losing time to perspecctive and interpretation but that can only a problem if you’re in a hurry. In most cases, it’d be far more limiting to have to express natural semantics in a constructed language than the other way around. What’s more is that all the orimitives of these languages are developed using the same strategies we use in natural languages. It’s just the morphs and structures that differ.