• 2 Posts
  • 62 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle





  • Yes, but the point you’re trying to make doesn’t make sense. The content subscription model for both of these are completely different.

    On Twitter (erm, I bounced shortly after the X shenanigans…) you subscribed to people and mostly saw tweets of people you follow, and the tweets they re-tweet, so it’s heavily individual-curated.

    On Facebook you “subscribe” to people and groups. Because your feed is mixed between people and group posts, you’re still getting a mostly-curated feed from friends, with algorithmic posts from groups. In the last few years they started blending in posts from groups/pages you aren’t in if your feed doesn’t have much content.

    Lemmy is entirely different. You only subscribe to communities. The curation is moderation style and upvotes. Individual people can guarantee their way into everyone’s feed by posting to the most active communities.



  • On your second point, it’s worth calling out that a lot of folks on Lemmy today came from the Reddit API changes. These folks left a very, very active site to a network with substantially fewer users and less content, and still pales in comparison.

    I think this serves as sufficient evidence to show there’s a large enough group of people who don’t care for the size/activity of a social network and participate on the principle of less-VC/Wall St funded social media.

    I don’t think EEE applies here. Worst case a bunch of servers defederate Threads. If the ActivityPub protocol gets terrible influence from Meta, the protocol spec can be forked.

    If, on the unlikely chance, the Lemmy devs start becoming Meta advocates and add ads in Lemmy, the software is AGPL3, it can be forked.

    Look at how Linux works around corporate abuse, especially with the Red Hat nonsense. As long as enough people care, a fork is made and maintained, and users will come.






  • Many thanks to you, Nutomic, and the several folks contributing in different ways. The effort put in to fix various “papercuts”, adding features, and the prompt handling of the security issue earlier this year have been fantastic.

    I especially appreciate the consideration that you folks put in to ensure it’s pretty straightforward and reliable to host. I’ve had a few hiccups here-and-there, but nothing a couple of very minor actions haven’t been able to fix.

    Lemmy’s fairly-straightforward architecture has made it fairly easy to troubleshoot issues, and overall, it’s one server package I really don’t have to worry about or babysit, so thanks for a headache-free experience 😀




  • I don’t understand why there’s such a hard push for iMessage access on Android. The tinkerer in me finds this thrilling to follow, but the end-user in me is skeptical.

    First, Apple being this hard-headed forces a marketplace for third party messaging apps. I don’t want to see Apple (or Google, or Facebook) be responsible for the dominant messaging platform in the US. If iMessage is on Android, the lure of being able to immediately add 50% of the country to your phone becomes compelling and gets rid of the need of third party services for a lot of people. I’d imagine this would cause Signal, Telegram, WhatsApp, Viber, etc. to shrink.

    Second, as an Apple user, I don’t see the excitement about having iMessage. I have group chats with all iPhone-buddies and mixed Android/iPhone. iMessage isn’t that exciting. The apps built around it and linked in Apple’s Messages app are the actual useful parts of it – Facetime to video chat and Find My to continuously show your friends on a map (great for traveling!). Maybe the games are silly fun from time to time?

    I think the RCS adoption is what’ll solve a lot of issues that Beeper is wanting to solve here. Apple is supposedly working with the GSMA to create an E2E standard (vs. relying on Vibe’s proprietary encryption extension), we should be able to exchange higher quality media, and (I think) cross-platform interactivity around messages improves significantly.




  • Tech demos being scripted is something I’ve come to expect, but for Google to practically lie about their capabilities is alarming. After all, they’re passing off a video of “here’s where we are” that’s really “this is what we want to get to”. Not really confidence inspiring.

    Their research ended up as the groundwork for what’d become the foundation of a lot of other AI services, so it’s obvious Google has the talent to pull this off. I can understand the rush to play catch-up since everyone else was questioning Google’s ability to deliver AI in a meaningful way publicly, but instead of leaving me with the impression that they’re on track to catch up, this leads me to think they’re much further behind than I previously thought.

    OpenAI has a lot of momentum right now, they showed an impressive product that’s become a household name in under a year. Even if OpenAI doesn’t show any improvements on their AI work, I think they can comfortably rest knowing that one of the wealthiest companies is having a difficult time catching up to their “wow” factor.