https://youtu.be/wnR6pgK8WjE

https://youtu.be/5aRcXyhDiuQ

Two videos which are dissecting the German case of nuclear in a fair manner.

Unshielded if you ignore around 149.000.000 km distance. And it’s still the largest cause of skin cancer which is one of the most widespread ones.

You stupid fuck should think for a second before you spout bullshit in such a vile and disrespectful manner.

I’m down for being critical on the internet but you should go back straight to Reddit as that is the cesspool that this type of behaviour deserves.

What about the people living there? What about strategic thought? What benefits do you hope to gain from that? This seems very impulsive and short sighted.

I would rather prefer keeping them in the eu and use the influence there still is. They should not be able to veto anything though…

Lol, I wish I could still live on a reality where this is an option…

Where to draw the line to satire?

I thin that’s just what we call “spinner” and does not represent the party line. I think if you look at the strength of the signals, uncapping safety spending over an amount where reaching anyways is a very fucking strong signal. If they actually spend accordingly which I thin they will do because every single one of those fuckers will find a way to make their hometown benefit from it. Also it’s easy to sell as nationalistic/patriotic preventing the usual storms of bullshit around government spending.

The autocratic twist I agree on but not to the degree that it immediately threatens our democracy, maybe by proxy though.

Although I have some criticism on the specifics of the deal it is a very strong sign of strong agency to be able to do this immediately after an election even before the new parliament is constituted. I believe that strong agency is the biggest threat to Russia actually.

The academic cuts are kinda brutal from what I gather

Probably is seeing how many of his peers throw around Sieg Heils

Yes. I’m sure Putin will not put Russia’s army activities nor arms production on halt during the truce.

Not really . There is a legal framework to go after nations which do not sufficiently translate eu law into national law. So the important lines are not up to the national governments and they can ultimately not do how they please. I do agree though that in practice in can be slow moving and that there is fishy stuff going on around what is prosecuted and what is not. I think Hungary is a good case to explain this as they continuously try to play the union: sometimes it kinda works but a lot of the times they get “punishment” in the form of the eu withholding funds etc… it’s not a perfect system but I think saying that they are only encouraged and that it’s up to the national governments is an overstatement. If the eu says “here is GDPR” it is happening, if the eu says “here is limits to nitrogen pollution” it is happening.

Being part of the eu means subjecting to new laws as EU law beats national. This would mean stopping some bullshit that happens in Canada as well as accepting that you don’t get to have full national sovereignty anymore. Whilst I think being part of th eu is absolutely worth it i would’ve guessed that it more contentious

I bought a refurbished Xcover 6p and so far it’s great. There’s also the perks of being intended for companies: very long software support and pogo pin charging accessoires.