• 1 Post
  • 42 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: August 2nd, 2024

help-circle
  • guismo@aussie.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.mlPrusa partners with Israeli company
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I know there are other options. It was just hypothetical.

    But no way. Just building the prusa mini was way harder than I thought. Took me days and I messed up many things. I wouldn’t try something even harder. Not that I have any way of having a 3d printer anymore… I’m trying to sell my prusa because of that. But I’ll stop trying to convince people to buy prusa.


  • There’s the choice of not selling this. It’s not like it will be crucial to them.

    I’m sure there are a lot of areas in spying software, for instance, that israel offer unique and lucrative products. But I have the choice to invest on something else instead.

    We’re talking about genocidal maniacs here. There’s not a lot of excuses to support them.




  • guismo@aussie.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.mlPrusa partners with Israeli company
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    The vast majority of their population doesn’t care about the genocide, the vast majority served in the military, there are almost no civilians in that invasion.

    Why would you, if you have any ethics, partner with people with a massive chance of being pro genocide unless there is no other option in the world?

    Also if it’s money going to their economy, to be converted directly into dead bodies.


  • guismo@aussie.zonetoTechnology@lemmy.mlPrusa partners with Israeli company
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 days ago

    I had noticed how their ethical standard seemed to be going down from the kind of spam from them I’ve been getting. But I held then to such high regard for their old open source contributions that I refused to believe.

    Thanks a lot for that into. I think I’m convinced now. No one with any ethics would partner with any Israeli company unless there was literally no other choice in the world.

    I’d rather use proprietary products.


  • I just have no idea what the life of a Facebook user, for instance, is like. What apps do they use, do they wear Facebook glasses? Facebook buttplugs? Can they use adblock?

    It’s a wild, unknown world, and I hope to keep it that way. What everyone knows is that they are filthy rich and they got there with private data. And that’s all everyone needs to know to decide if they want to make them richer and their data is the tool for that.

    But the specifics elude me.


  • To be honest, since I have adblock I find it hard to understand too. How can that make so much money? But all the current richest companies and people built their empire on private data right? Google, Facebook, elon musk and so on, so it’s very easy to see the proof. You give them your data, you give them money.

    Now, power is easier to understand. If you want to control or kill people, the more information you have the better. It’s easy to see why evil governments have always loved spying.


  • One thing I find it odd that I don’t ever see mentioned is the most obvious: private data is money and power for companies. Do you like X (meta, google, literal moronic x, etc) company that much that you want to donate money to them and make them more powerful?

    Almost no one would say yes. They don’t care about their privacy, but they certainly don’t think poor zuckeberg needs some donations and more power.

    It’s by far the biggest reason I care about my data. If I liked the company I wouldn’t mind the donation. But only evil companies would try to profit from personal data, so that can’t exist. My hate for these companies and my wish to see them destroyed far outweighs my concern with my privacy.

    That includes governments of course. The one with the most spying, like the US or israel are the ones I hate the most and try as much as I can to not give them more power.


  • Yeah, I don’t know. I know that there are softwares specific for invoicing but I’ve never used one, nor did I use to send too many invoices. Most of the time I was an employee, doing some other freelances, so it wasn’t too much to keep track.

    I used Inkscape because I was more used to it, working with graphics most of my life. LibreOffice is probably easier. But I don’t know how that’s supposed to be done with proprietary softwares either.

    Hopefully someone with more experience on this can help him.


  • What software do you use?

    I worked with 3D for decades and Blender replaced almost everything. The performance is actually better on Linux. I personally use Linux mint, but regarding software it barely matters what distro you use nowadays.

    But support, compatibility, ease of use can vary a lot. I haven’t used another distro for many years so I can’t say much.

    If you rely on autodesk and adobe stuff you will probably suffer. But personally I would say it’s deserved because there are not a lot of companies more evil than them. The sooner you start trying alternatives the better.

    Invoicing I just used inkscape but it’s not great. Be prepared to make some sacrifices, but it’s all worthy to get rid of microsoft.


  • they contracted with the AFP to run the first node of the server and process the data. (Australian law does not provide the same protections as U.S. law for its citizens.)

    Thanks for that link. I didn’t know that. We are below the US in privacy laws! Is there any first world country worst than Australia?

    They said all users were criminals, but who knows what they are calling a crime, specially with the retarded laws down here…

    It shows what I suspected, that Australian software and servers must be avoided even more than Americans.



  • Problem being I don’t know how that would work, especially since banks would probably hate freedom respecting systems.

    Yeah, that’s the thing, I don’t think it’s possible without becoming as evil as the alternative. If it is, I’m all for it. But my freedom comes first.

    Australia will lose cash over time. All first world countries will. You can’t stop “progress”. It’s just a matter of how long, and then how long until you are not a citizen without Google play on your phone. Or considered disabled, which is already happening.


  • I’ll be honest that I don’t know how it works because I never cared. What I know is that it doesn’t work with root or most roms, it removes my freedom because my phone can’t be “trusted”, so any other issue it has is not important. Even if it was more private than cash. It needs Google to “trust” my phone and I really, seriously trust a thief more than Google.

    Cards are another massive issue but it’s a problem so widespread that there’s nothing I can do about it anymore. I use cash whenever I can but I know humanity and it will die soon because people don’t care.

    And later tap to pay will be mandatory and if you don’t have spyware (Google play, apple) on your phone you can’t buy anything anymore.

    The present is bad, the future is horrible.


  • guismo@aussie.zonetoLinux@lemmy.mlThe state of Linux phones in 2025
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Not that I own all these, but what do they have to do with my phone? I don’t see any connection to those except where I wanted to create it.

    I’m not stopping you from wanting your apple/Linux phone. Or anyone from making it. I’m just saying that I believe that my interests are similar to a lot of people who care about open source, and therefore:

    -The people who care about open source will not support that enough to be successfull (currently, as more people keep saying stuff like “I just can’t live without this convenience” it might change).

    -The people who care about those conveniences that much don’t care about open source, privacy or freedom, and they won’t support it either. They will only support it if it’s even more convenient and lazy, and for that the apple/Linux phone would have to be even more evil than the current options.

    So in my mind it’s a dead end, and I personally I don’t support it. But go for it! And I do believe that over times those conveniences will be seen more and more as needs and soon we might have a Linux phone I wouldn’t want to use. But good for those who want it.

    BUT just to be clear, I desperately want a Linux phone, yes! But my concerns are stuff like: does the hardware work well? does the camera work well? Does the GPS work well? What about signal with the telecoms? Battery lifre? You know, mostly hardware related with the software.

    Tap to pay, car play, siri, all those things can be on the list, but way down on the bottom.


  • guismo@aussie.zonetoLinux@lemmy.mlThe state of Linux phones in 2025
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s a bit extreme. Some of those are not linked.

    Yes you can not have cloud pictures without having to trust the server. But you can have an open source, inspected system that uses gps without any related data being shared. Gps doesn’t send data, it’s the system choice to create a way to send it to someone. You can have a Linux phone that doesn’t chose to do that.

    You can have convenience with privacy, but the companies offering those services don’t want that, nor do the consumers care.

    And those consumers would not care about a Linux phone.


  • guismo@aussie.zonetoLinux@lemmy.mlThe state of Linux phones in 2025
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It’s not the existence of the option. It’s the requirements it brings.

    Which companies will this phone need to shake hands for that to work? What price will they have to pay? What risks does it bring to my privacy on that phone? What requirements will they have? Banks, car companies, credit card companies etc are not the kind of company I want to see involved in my system.

    If magically you can have those agreements without any risk for me, then I’m happy with it. But it’s impossible. You want a different product than mine with those needs.

    I need freedom and trust in my system and I would like convenience. You need convenience and would like freedom and trust. It’s a matter of how much you have to sacrifice of one to get the other. It’s a personal choice.

    For example, even before Android shitified itself, tap to pay wouldn’t work if you have root or most custom roms. Is it the price I have to pay for your option? Limit how I can use my phone so that Banks can trust it? Imagine if I couldn’t use sudo on Linux because someone wants to bend over to a bank?

    I would look for a different system.


  • guismo@aussie.zonetoLinux@lemmy.mlThe state of Linux phones in 2025
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    Or, touch wood, using cash!

    Imagine the horror. Something that can even work if there’s no internet at all, like the cave man used…

    Or, sarcasm aside, besides working properly offline, it doesn’t give money to evil companies like visa. Then with the phone there’s yet another evil company profiting from you. And giving people the idea that it’s impossible to live without doing so.

    It’s a little extra convenience for those who like it, sure, but it’s crazy to say they can’t live without it.


  • guismo@aussie.zonetoLinux@lemmy.mlThe state of Linux phones in 2025
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    That’s the problem. The things you think “people” need is what they already have and it can’t be different. “I want to trust everything on a company online but I want my data to be private and safe.” You have to choose. For those people who think they “need” what you say, they already have apple and Google.

    Just like Linux was never meant to replicate windows “features” like cortana and others, and it didn’t, and it works for those who don’t want those things which is why they want Linux.

    The requirements for Linux to have your “needs” would make me not want it, and then it would just be a poor version of apple without the trillions of dollars that come with it. It wouldn’t please either side.

    The things open source people care will always be a minority. It’s sad but it’s the reality.