• 0 Posts
  • 50 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 4th, 2023

help-circle




  • highduc@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlManjaro OS
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    I know you need a new nvidia driver every time the kernel updates, but why keep 50 kernel versions? My beef was them offering so many (outdated) versions instead of keeping the latest one which would make things very simple for users (imo).


  • highduc@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlManjaro OS
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    I know that these packages are “linked”, and for every kernel update you need a new nvidia driver, I don’t understand though why they keep so many kernel versions in the repo (and their respective nvidia drivers ofc). Just makes things confusing, I assume people generally want the latest kernel the distro has to offer, or if they want something else it’s a different kernel “flavor” like lts, zen, rt, etc.



  • highduc@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlManjaro OS
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It’s not all “purists” and “tribalism”, Manjaro actually has issues. Besides the well known certificate issues and older packages, I have the following anecdote which made me really dislike it.

    A friend has Manjaro and one day his nvidia drivers stopped working after an update. I helped troubleshoot over the phone, while looking over the wiki. For nvidia drivers they have their own wrapper around pacman.

    Turns out there’s a different nvidia driver for each kernel version. Already a stupid design. So unlike arch where there’s 1 kernel package (the latest the distro offers) and 1 matching nvidia driver, Manjaro has dozens…

    The wiki never mentions how to install or update the drivers manually with pacman or anything like that. It pushes their own tool, a stupid wrapper around pacman, which is supposed to manage this for you.

    In my friend’s case, the tool failed. It was trying to run pacman but there was a conflict issue. But the tool didn’t show the pacman output, so we couldn’t figure out what the tool is trying to do, and why it doesn’t work. We tried removing the tool and re-installing, and all kinds of messing around with it. It failed to install the drivers, it failed to remove the drivers, it kept failing whatever we tried.

    Eventually we figured out the naming convention they used for the packages (again not mentioned in the wiki), and manage to install the correct kernel - driver pair manually, using pacman.

    Tl;dr: poor design, bad documentation, and they push their own crappy tools which hinder instead of helping







  • highduc@lemmy.mltoLinux@lemmy.mlEveryday Use of GNU Guix
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the language is harder but more powerful than Nix’s.
    Imo a better manual and examples would help a lot.
    I’d say one of the biggest issues is the one with proprietary drivers - you can’t really find examples and guides on how to get drivers working because it’s kept hush-hush, and to install them yourself requires knowledge on how to set things up, knowledge which beginner users don’t have ofc.
    I’m a big fan of Guix and Guile but atm I couldn’t switch over due to this.





  • Regarding the Android bit, it’s so cancerous because everything is locked down and users have no control over the OS. They don’t have admin rights on their own device. Nothing to do with Linux, that’s jus the kernel. Android + GNU utils & root access would be completely different.
    People shit on the GNU/Linux meme, but Android actually proves that just the Linux kernel can be put in an OS that’s just as hostile to the user as anything proprietary.