More like sponsored content, rather than content. Or, as we usually call it, advertising.

Travel is enlightening. When you unlock more if the map, you’ll find out the orientation is different, too!

Yes, but selling the llms is not profitable either. They are burning through cash at extraordinary rates.

Even at highly subsidised rates, ai startups can’t make a profitable product. It’s nuts.

Yes, and both should be held responsible. The person or entity that instructed itz plus open ai for allowing its software to commit illegal acts with impunity.

It’s completely ridiculous that these companies are becoming a serious social problem, while at the same time not being held to the standards that other companies would be if they did these acts without the use of ai.

The agent did nothing. Software with ability to work independently gained access under instructions to get information. This is no different to telling an employee to get something in Coles and they steal it. Hold them both accountable.

Reddit folklore.

In the times when it felt like a small community, someone was in an airport, I think and thought another person was on Reddit. They asked how they could tell for sure, and it was decided there should be a question someone could ask, where the answer would make it clear that they were a Reddit user. The question was “when does a narwhal bacon”. The answer was midnight.

Or 1.9m in this case.

So, why is it so uncommon?

Yes, it’s why we changed to call it climate change rather than global warming. We get hot days in summer but also terribel storms and blizzards with unseasonably cold weather. And summers can be extremely hot and dry but that’s not a given.

Average temperatures are certainly going up, hence the old term but there is much more variability is the bigger problem. A degree here or there doesn’t kill thousand. A jump of 20degrees forn2 weeks does, even if it drops down again.

A soft-fluff factory is dangerous if there aren’t safeguards. It’s not that ai or llms are dangerous as a concept. It’s that they are being given authorities and access that they shouldn’t as there are inadequate safeguards built in and there are inadequate punishments for the neglectful development. Make the companies and users liable for the errors and they will work hard in that rather than chasing investment and PR with all their effort.

Its often the case with new technology that the law doesn’t match how they are used. However, as technology progresses, thinks are scaled and rolled out at a much more rapid pace. Hence the term hyperscalers. The law needs to catch up. Instead the law seems to give concessions. Partly due to regulatory capture, partly due to economic reasons, partly due to lack of understanding, partly due to corruption.

I was chatting with someone recently with lots of long covod symptoms. They were mild but persistent for over a year. Her doctor said it’s not long covid as too mild. I was thinking to myself, isn’t everything on a spectrum. If her match, it’s covid, unless he has an alternative answer. Unless you see black and white, it’s horwes, not zebras.

The weekly infections isn’t so bad. That means everyone catching it once every 2 years on average. I assumed it would be an annual or semi annual thing.

However, the world is forever changed. I was recently on holiday in Bali with my mother in law. She was quite unwell with cocid like symptoms. Couldn’t get a test anywhere. The locals would sell anything if they could make a buck, as they are mostly subsitence living. I assume it’s a policy.

I know they are still available in Australia but they are less prevalent and nobody bothers testing or isolating if they are. People think it’s just a cold as they don’t personally get very sick. The selfishness and lack of scientific and medical understanding in the age of information is an indctment of humanity.

Where are you getting your definitions from?Do they have a basis in law? I’ve only ever seen private property refer to assets like land or buildings. Ivenever seen a distinction based on owner type. Also personal property is usually based on items that are not mobile, which would include art, irrespective of whether it’s for personal enjoyment or as an investment, whether by a person or a company.

Yee, my point about renting rather than ownership is often due to the ability for technology he tied to the owner and deactivated remotely. So, not transferrable nor true ownership.

I don’t disagree, but the concept of ownership is still a legal concept in most countries. Erodin git likely leads to more problems than ignoring it. We’ve moved more and more away from ownership, to renting what we need. That hasn’t been to the benefit of most people. The concept of ownership being eroded more doesn’t help that.

I certainly agree that there is something to be said for wealth redistribution over generations. There are also pieces of art or culture or history that are more important than others.

I agree with the concept of Germany-suing for financial settlement, but if the dealer was the owner, it would seem odd to recover any possessions for humanity rather than a legal owner. Would it be OK if there was no nazi thefts to take important works from the owners just because it’s an important work?

Maybe is a weasel word when they know it isn’t. Also, they are trying to change the definition over time.

Its iterative improvement but with the same risk of hallucinations and the same difficulty in giving it access to sensitive data or sensitive authority and it messes up significantly.

Specifically the Jim Carrey cartoon Ebenezer Scrooge.

And the more digital it becomes, the more likely there is a hidden kill switch or back door.

The cost of coffee in a cafe is more about staff and rent, sure, but when the raw ingredients go up, it still affects the price.

Yes, either a novel virus. Or a modified version of something like measles that can cause immune amnesia?

That’s not what they said though. They said a .com domain was not trustworthy. Its a disyrust of ‘mainstream’ media.

As you yourself point out, NBC is not automatically trustworthy, but the choice of domain is not the reason why. The billionaire and corporate influence, combined with clickbait journalism is why.

Someone not trusting NBC is fine. Someone choosing to believe that it’s fake news just because it’s mainstream media when it refers to verifiabke facts and a mainstream personality is a failure of our society to adapt to the online world. A failure of education and a failure of media control and regulation.