But if I check the maps from the 18 hundreds that’s pretty clearly German territory :(

Can Germany go ahead and take back schlesien?

didn’t give a fuck about Russia’s proposals not to bring the conflict to war

You mean the conflict that only exists because Russia wants to expand their territory?

Nah, tail recursion optimization can just reuse the same stack frame again and again. It’s going to loop until it wraps around what ever integer width it has and then tells you if the biggest integer is even or odd. Or, if it’s nice, it’s going to complain about the wrap around

Wouldn’t this be reflected in the pyramid I posted above?

Afaict migration helps to stabilize the ratio, but is seemingly not enough improve it. To do that we would need to have more migration than we currently do.

Hm. That doesn’t seem to match this graphic. I heard that on the last “Lage der Nation” Podcast they did. I’ll see if I can find the source the references there

Edit: found a german source here: https://www.bpb.de/themen/soziale-lage/demografischer-wandel/196643/auswirkungen-des-demografischen-wandels-auf-die-sozialsysteme/

Weil die Geburtenquote hierzulande aber gut vier Jahrzehnte bei rund 1,4 Geburten pro Frau stagnierte, ist inzwischen jede Generation ein Drittel kleiner als noch ihre Elterngeneration.

This says every generation is about 33% smaller than the one before it, which would make the ratio stay pretty unbalanced

However the ration will start to improve in a decade or so

I don’t think that’s true. Each generation after the boomers has been smaller by about the same factor meaning the ratio between working age and non-working age will stay mostly the same

That account is roaming German communities and spreads rightwing bullshit

Du bist so widerlich.

At least this time they cant argue with §202a the “Hackerparagraf” because an adblocker doesn’t help you access more data. It actually helps you access less data.

This is my *well akchually" moment of the day: CSS is technically turing complete and thus should be counted as a programming language

Isn’t that going to make playing ADC way easier? I always had problems with the fast mouse actions involved in positioning and attacking

Oh yeah, the current rust work is about giving drivers access to the core abstractions of the kernel

Gotta keep a distance to that dirty unsafe code!

The 1% that allows Linux to run on the New macbooks if i understand asahi Linux correctly

I dont have a problem with systemd. I have a problem with people claiming systemd doesn’t have a massive non-modular blob of code at it’s core. There is no need to misrepresent what systemd is to deflect systemd critics.

Again, please read what I am writing. I don’t care about the disk space. And I don’t have a problem with systemd itself.

As I said: I didn’t mean massive in the sense of “disk space is an expensive resource”. Disk is cheap nowadays. I meant massive as in “there is a lot of code and by that a lot of complexity in this one binary”. You just inferred I meant bloat. I get that that is my fault for not specifying it the first time But I already explained I didn’t mean that so I don’t really get why you keep riding that 10 meg point.

Sorry but there is a libsystemd-shared listed in your screenshot

[XXX@YYY]$ ls -lh /usr/lib/libsystemd.so.0.40.0 /usr/lib/systemd/libsystemd-core-257.7-1.so /usr/lib/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.7-1.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 1.2M Jun 25 14:42 /usr/lib/libsystemd.so.0.40.0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2.4M Jun 25 14:42 /usr/lib/systemd/libsystemd-core-257.7-1.so
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4.5M Jun 25 14:42 /usr/lib/systemd/libsystemd-shared-257.7-1.so

Are you intentionally misrepresenting this or are you actually missing these? Also: This isn’t about diskspace. Obviously every halfway modern PC can provide the disk space to house the systemd binaries. Disk is cheap but crucially not necessarily tied to complexity. A simple application can take Gigs and still be simple if it includes a lot of resources (graphical, audio, whatever). And a very complex thing can “only” take a few megabytes if it only includes code. Like systemd does.

Note that I am a (mostly) happy user of systemd. I am just annoyed at people misrepresenting facts to fight anti-systemd-bullshit.

Did you accidentally forget A) the .so files these binaries link against and B) the actual systemd daemon binary?