this is very much true, but it is still ur choice whether u honk at them. u will find that many times people will notice 2 seconds later and give a lil thank/apology wave ur way.

i think the best way of handling it if ur in a hurry is a super short honk, just enough to wake them up without making them feel attacked.

nuuu i always thought it was! so sad

nobody reads the terms of service, ever.

also, no modern game companies with any relevance use a FOSS license.

so the way i see it, gamers have two options:

• stop playing videogames or
• only play supertuxkart and dwarf fortress

neither of these would happen at a scale large enough to force game studios into making their games FOSS.

the only way i can see of making this happen is by either:

• a series of very popular, targeted boycotts at studios, or
• making governments regulate the industry.

and with the second option, history has shown that only small changes have a chance of passing. effectively abolishing copyright law for software is not something the EU will ever do, no matter how many signatures a petition gets.

some good ideas here already. i just wanted to suggest that if ur going to open it, the option of adding a small resistor in series is also there. thatll lower the current going thru the LED and make it darker.

staatsräson, as the article also states, is not a meaningful legal category

we can guess, yes. but the fact that the claim has not been backed by any criminal proceedings, and they dont even want to say what exactly theyre accused of chanting, is a ridiculous basis for deportation if u ask me.

from the article:

Buhlmann explicitly warned that the legal basis for revoking the three EU citizens’ freedom of movement was insufficient — and that deporting them would be unlawful.

that is part of their supposed reasoning. the four are accused of chanting antisemitic things, but they dont tell u what has allegedly been chanted.

either way, deporting EU citizens who havent been committed of any crimes is very legally dubious.

deportations in general if u ask me, are morally dubious.

1. i never claimed whether u double-checked or not.

2. i know, but still i think its important not to make it seem like posting chatgpt responses without oversight is okay.

if u normalize listening to ai hallucinations in any situation, people (especially tech-illiterate people) are going to replicate that behaviour in more important situations.

please double-check chatgpt’s answers before posting them as facts. chatgpt does not know what it is saying, and often hallucinates false information.

its good for making nicely-written texts, not for researching anything important

i see a future where we no longer access websites directly because websites got so bloated that using a bot to give us the content instead is just way easier