Or less common opinions that you’ve been waiting for a chance to share?

Apologies if this has been asked before; I didn’t see it among recent posts and I like to hear everyone’s hot takes.

  • RBWellsV23@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
    11·
    7 hours ago

    Probably a pretty normal opinion for a lady, but based on the content here apparently an unpopular one on NSFW.

    Stories > Non explicit stills > Explicit stills > Video

    Video is usually the least sexy porn. Even if it’s one I enjoy. It’s almost an inverse relationship, the less work my own mind has to do, the less stimulating it is.

    • RepressedLemmier@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
      2·
      3 hours ago

      I think chats and doing favors are the hottest. I have seen it all, and it’s really hard to be turned on by just a sexy body.

      But the thought of making someone else wet…god yes!

    • Know1eweno@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
      6·
      7 hours ago

      Never mind that virtually all the videos do the exact same things, following some “rough sex” checklist. They’re all “fuck,” and very few “making love.” It’s no wonder incels have such screwed up ideas about sex.

        • FistingEnthusiast@lemmynsfw.comEnglish
          3·
          1 hour ago

          Real amateur stuff is definitely the best

          My fiancée has really grown in confidence since she started posting stuff and got positive feedback

          She knows that I think she’s the most beautiful woman in the world, but she also says that I’m biased!

        • bizarroland@fedia.io
          31·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah, I think the supernormalization factor is like the biggest indicator that capitalism has invaded pornography.

          In like the 1970s, two people having sex was enough for it to count as porn. They would be hairy and dirty and the sex was not amazing and spectacular, but it was almost always people just really enjoying each other on film.

          Then they realized that videos did better if all of the participants were conventionally attractive. And to a large part, that’s fine. I mean, I’m not particularly interested in seeing people that I am not attracted to naked.

          But then they realized that the more extreme the sexual proportions of the bodies are, the better the video did, and the more money they would make, so now the girl has to be 4’9" with 74 ZZZ breasts.

          The guy doesnt matter at all as long as he has a huge cock.

          And it’s exciting, the first time you’re exposed to this brand of media, but it does not take very long for it to become repetitive

          To fight that they started putting in stories, but the stories are terrible.

          The available plotlines are, hot girl has sex, incest, cheating, raceplay, or prostitution, and they’re always very poorly acted out because they’re just a pretext to allow sex to happen.

          Its all so boring and stale.

          • trungulox@lemm.eeEnglish
            4·
            4 hours ago

            Maybe it’s just because so much porn is full of conventionally hot women but i definitely prefer it if I don’t find the people attractive. Like. I don’t know why but it’s always better that way.

    • acidbattery@lemm.eeOPEnglish
      4·
      6 hours ago

      I’m with you on this one. Content that allows you to use imagination lets you fill in the gaps to your liking and put yourself in the scenario. With video, it’s harder to mentally filter out the parts that don’t interest you, and videos will rarely be exactly what you want from start to finish.

    • tal@lemmy.todayEnglish
      2·
      6 hours ago

      Stories have a lower cost of production, which also permits for a wider variety of topics to be covered.

      Thr lower the cost of production, the better you can do a better job of covering the long tail, providing smaller quantities of stuff that’s more niche or specialized, and have a smaller pool of people who are interested in it.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_tail

      In business, the term long tail is applied to rank-size distributions or rank-frequency distributions (primarily of popularity), which often form power laws and are thus long-tailed distributions in the statistical sense. This is used to describe the retailing strategy of selling many unique items with relatively small quantities sold of each (the “long tail”)—usually in addition to selling fewer popular items in large quantities (the “head”).

      Anderson cites research published in 2003 by Erik Brynjolfsson, Yu (Jeffrey) Hu, and Michael D. Smith, who first used a log-linear curve on an XY graph to describe the relationship between Amazon.com sales and sales ranking. They showed that the primary value of the internet to consumers comes from releasing new sources of value by providing access to products in the long tail.[10]