WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前Israel strikes Iran, no US involvement, US officials saywww.reuters.comexternal-linkmessage-square134fedilinkarrow-up1284arrow-down17
arrow-up1277arrow-down1external-linkIsrael strikes Iran, no US involvement, US officials saywww.reuters.comWizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 4 个月前message-square134fedilink
minus-squareWizardofFrobozz@lemmy.caOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down21·edit-24 个月前Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not a bad call. As for your second point- in this situation is it acceptable or justified? Fuck no. Is it tactically the correct move, given what these pieces of shit are trying to accomplish? Yes.
minus-squareCruxifux@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down2·4 个月前Japan was already ready to surrender. This is unclassified now. So how was it not a bad call exactly? Assuming we both agree on my first assertion.
minus-squareShoeThrower@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16arrow-down3·4 个月前So, in your view, intentionally killing civilians is OK if they’re Japanese, but not if they’re Palestinian. Fascinating.
minus-squaresupersquirrel@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 个月前Yes they were ESPECIALLY Nagasaki A second one was not needed, that is easy to prove and I remain unconvinced the first bomb dropped was necessary either.
Hiroshima and Nagasaki were not a bad call.
As for your second point- in this situation is it acceptable or justified? Fuck no. Is it tactically the correct move, given what these pieces of shit are trying to accomplish? Yes.
Japan was already ready to surrender. This is unclassified now. So how was it not a bad call exactly? Assuming we both agree on my first assertion.
So, in your view, intentionally killing civilians is OK if they’re Japanese, but not if they’re Palestinian.
Fascinating.
Yes they were ESPECIALLY Nagasaki
A second one was not needed, that is easy to prove and I remain unconvinced the first bomb dropped was necessary either.