HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-210 days agoWhy make it complicated?lemmy.mlexternal-linkmessage-square122fedilinkarrow-up1354arrow-down138file-text
arrow-up1316arrow-down1external-linkWhy make it complicated?lemmy.mlHiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · edit-210 days agomessage-square122fedilinkfile-text
minus-squaremasterspace@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·10 days agoYeah, it’s explicitly distinct from const a: String which says it won’t change, and var a: String, which means this is legacy code that needs fixing.
minus-squarePsaldorn@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·10 days agoIf there’s only two options you only need one keyword
minus-squareHotzilla@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-29 days agoTrue, but var and let are not same in js, so there is three. if(true) { var a = "dumdum" } console.log(a) Is valid and functioning javascript. With let it is not.
minus-squareLemminary@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 days agoAh, but this is JS, so there are three options! And they all function entirely differently. And your assumptions don’t apply, either. :D
Yeah, it’s explicitly distinct from
const a: Stringwhich says it won’t change, andvar a: String, which means this is legacy code that needs fixing.If there’s only two options you only need one keyword
True, but var and let are not same in js, so there is three.
if(true) {var a = "dumdum"}console.log(a)Is valid and functioning javascript. With let it is not.
Ah, but this is JS, so there are three options! And they all function entirely differently. And your assumptions don’t apply, either. :D