• Axaoe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 years ago

    Thank you, while I would like to see several changes (including a new audit) I don’t feel the underlying tech is invalidated by their server location.

    Obviously people are opinionated (more so now that user bases are somewhat easily swayed post-WhatsApp awakening, it seems to me) but I too feel there are several reasons to still choose Signal.

    • iszomer@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 years ago

      I guess you can make a case that Signal is just as centralized as many other messaging services too, despite it’s many notable security features. And iirc, WhatsApp is basically a fork of Signal minus some features and tighter integration with Facebook.

      • dragonfly0@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        Whatsapp is no signal fork at all

        They just implemented the same cryptographic algorithm, the app isn’t open source or trustable

        • poVoq@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 years ago

          It is a non-standard XMPP with a later added encryption scheme outcontracted to Moxie and likely similar to what Signal uses / OMEMO is.

      • Dreeg Ocedam@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 years ago

        WhatsApp is basically a fork of Signal

        No, WhatsApp implements the Signal protocol, but that’s it. Their entire codebase is proprietary (and their implementation of the Signal protocol is too).