Had this been done when there was no Holocaust by Starvation in Gaza and those politicians were not under public pressure to do something about it, then yeah, it would have been a positive action for Palestine as whole since it would open the door for eventual improvements there, but right now, by delaying effective action as wished by the public, that tiny positive potential impact in the future is more than offset by the continued deaths that mean there will be no such Future for tens of thousands or even millions in Gaza, and this “action” does nothing to address that.

The greatest impact this has is to reduce pressure on those politicians to address the problem, so de facto this is a step backwards compared to “doing nothing” as it wields the same result to Gazans whilst by reducing the pressure on politicians makes it less likely that they’re forces to take an effective action.

The only way to confuse this with a step forward if you completelly ignore the broader context of how most of the people who might derive a tiny benefit from this will be dead or have lost far more than they will gain from said tiny benefit when that benefit delivers anything, and the political managing of public opinion component of this.