• njm1314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    Why on Earth would you broadcast where you’re putting your nuclear subs? The entire point is for enemies not to know where they are. I mean I assume he’s lying, but fuck.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      30 days ago

      Eh, it makes sense as a deterrent. And he didn’t specify where they are. But I don’t think he knows “nuclear submarines” are not nuclear armed submarines. They are just nuclear-powered, meaning they don’t consume oxygen to run (no fuel burned) and don’t need to resurface for a long time.

      • lividweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        “Nuclear-powered submarine” is basically redundant these days for the US, since they all are and have been since 2007. It can be safely assumed that a reference to a “Nuclear Submarine” in this context is one that is nuclear-armed.

    • lemmylommy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      30 days ago

      Did he? So you know where „appropriate regions“ are? And you think they haven’t been there before?

    • shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      The “boomers” were already within ICBM strike range. This is common knowledge. Saying it out loud is a threat I’ve never heard, not even during the Cold War.