• GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    just because they are accepting of people based on gender identity doesn’t mean toxicity cannot exist.

    terfs are a great example of that.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 months ago

      Sure, but I’m saying in general. I don’t know why you’re so convinced of your position from the one experience you had.

      • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        a community that allows squatting to happen and does nothing to resolve the issue is going to be plagued with chaos in the future. it opens an attack vector for supply chain attacks and altogether breeds distrust in the platform entirely.

        on the flip-side, a developer that squats on common library names in an attempt to garner support to resolve an issue and is ignored tells me two things;

        1. this is normal enough that the community doesn’t feel the need to address the toxic behavior
        2. the issue of squatting isn’t perceived as a high enough threat and they will take no action

        in my case both of those observations tell me the community at large isn’t mature enough or forward thinking enough to allow me to use it as a solution. it also forces me to assume that the matter of toxic behavior will only continue to fester unchecked within the community.