• pmk@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 days ago

    It certainly seems like public opinion changed the tast ten years or so. As an ubuntu user, could you confirm or deny these claims I’ve seen? One is that firefox is a snap even if you try to install it with apt. Another is that they show ads to get paid ubuntu in the terminal output?

    • Lifter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 days ago

      I can confirm them both. I’m considering moving to Debian because of this.

      You can uninstall snap and use flatpak for those apps but it was a slap in the face when Firefox suddenly was replaced by a snap through apt

    • PastafARRian@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      12 days ago

      You got me there, firefox is the only snap I really use. Probably can be removed and replaced with apt version but honestly I don’t care much. I tend to clean reinstall frequently and I leave as much in the default setup as I can.

      If it works, it works. But it does cause me to have another step to update everything, which is slightly annoying. And yes I don’t like Canonical’s insistence on snaps. I just try to avoid them really.

      Ads, certainly never seen them.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      True and true.

      If you do a minimal install, it will still force apt to install snapd and snaps for certain packages, including Firefox. It can be worked around, but it’s very hard to keep snaps out of your system. This is why I dumped Ubuntu and never looked back. Fedora is my happy place, now.