• LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    They are just trying to annoy people and micromanage any left leaning or non partisan organization so they give up and just submit to the nazi’s.

    Don’t do it, nothing good comes from giving the nazi’s what they want.

  • mhague@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is slop. Not necessarily AI generated, but definitely dumbass-generated.

    Literally not one ounce of effort. No digging into vague studies Republicans are talking about. No overview of Wikipedia’s current policy. No questions posed to someone who knows about Wikipedia and/or government attempts to control the narrative.

    It’s not even a good thing that the article only tells you the core facts. Too much goes unsaid. No context might as well be a hallucination from an AI for how much it bridges the gap between what you think and what reality contains.

  • BigBenis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 days ago

    We’re investigating private companies for bias now? Are Truth Social and Fox News next??

  • compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    It’s funny, because they clearly have the idea in their head that Wikipedia is a single organization capable of an ideological bias. When if you take a single look at some talk pages, it would become clear very quickly that Wikipedia is built on people vociferously disagreeing and bringing sources to make the information presented ever more credible and unbiased.

    • original_charles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      Wikipedia is built on people vociferously disagreeing and bringing sources to make the information presented ever more credible and unbiased.

      Yeah, that’s why they are upset with it.

  • space@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    No they aren’t. House republicans can’t read. They will just say it’s biased and try to force it further right from wherever it currently is without checking.

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 days ago

    “Stop accurately documenting my actual behavior!” - House Repugnicans

  • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 days ago

    I remember a time when telling the truth wasn’t considered bias by the Republican party. It was the same time when, “conservative speech” didn’t mean lies, misinformation, and hate speech.

  • jali67@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    Anything that does not fall in line with our propaganda machine is biased or lying!!

  • MehBlah@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    What law does that break?

    Edit: Hey downvoter. If you aren’t stalking why don’t you include a comment on how you think having a bias is in anyway illegal.