• Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      the standard wikipedia skin is plenty information dense, while also actually being readable.

      yes i’m cranky because the glorification of the old web is largely nostalgia and completely ignores things like accessibility

      • tiramichu@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Both true, but for totally different reasons, right.

        Early Internet was kinda bonkers because it was disconnected and unregulated and anonymous and nobody yet understood UX design so every site was different, yet always cluttered and overwhelming.

        Modern Internet is bonkers because UX patterns and user behaviour is so understood and homogenised that every site is basically the same simplified interface, along with the same dark patterns that manipulate user behaviour to maximise corporate profit, rather than trying to give users what they actually want.

        The old type of bonkers was far more preferable.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      i mean yeah, it’s like comparing the first car to a modern kei car, there’s been some obvious improvements despite the fact that most cars are oversized and way too sleek

      the early web looks like shit, the standard modern website is hidden behind 4 layers of ads, but a modern website that isn’t shittified is pretty fucking great.

  • guldukat@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    Member when the Internet wasn’t profitized? Member when popups were only on porn and warez sites?

  • hansolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Yeah, this was sort of the “corporate-ish” color scheme and web design template back then for websites. Tons of things looked like this. Facebook looked like this for a decade or more. Large banner images took too long to load and this looked “professional” because it looked like corporate letterhead.

    Xerox used red, but similar layout to some degree.

    IBM’s website in 2002

    Random website from 2002