• ObjectivityIncarnate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Some messages made references to Trump, though they do not provide any evidence of criminal conduct.

      Welp.

      The article also doesn’t mention those communications implicating anyone (alive) other than Maxwell, which isn’t nothing, but definitely not the illumination people were hoping for, I don’t think.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        You’re right, you made me dig a little further.

        Edit: Here is one of the mentions of Trump:

        Trump’s name surfaced again around the time Epstein was making an intense backchannel lobbying effort to get federal prosecutors to drop their case against him. It was in an email dated Aug. 23, 2007, a month before Epstein signed the non-prosecution agreement with the US Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida that ended the federal component of the Epstein investigation.

        The emails indicate that Maxwell may have been referring to a team of reporters covering Epstein who she expected would be seeking information from Trump; from Abe Gosman, the late healthcare magnate whose palatial property sold to Trump for $41 million after a heated bidding war with Epstein; from court documents in West Palm Beach; and from Joel Pashcow, the Palm Beach police and fire foundation board member who’d traveled on Epstein’s private jet. Pashcow did not respond to a request for comment.

        https://www.bloomberg.com/features/2025-jeffrey-epstein-emails-ghislaine-maxwell/

        Here is what is on Prince Andrew:

        The unsealed documents released Thursday also contain allegations that Jane Doe 3 — whose allegations match those of Giuffre — was “forced” to have sexual relations with Prince Andrew on Epstein’s private island in what was described as “an orgy” with numerous other under-aged girls. It does not specify the year. The woman was allegedly instructed by Epstein to “give the Prince whatever he demanded” and “report back to him on the details of the sexual abuse.”

        https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/unsealed-documents-show-epstein-maxwell-correspondence-2015-n1235307

        The email proves he knew Epstein at least as long as Epestein had the island up and running.

    • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Oh damn I can’t wait to faicism to fall now that the files are coming out.

      Anytime now guys. Definitely not a distraction or a waste of time.

      • pelespirit@sh.itjust.worksM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Idk, light magas around the edges might be swayed once they hear all of the times their leader acts like a pedophile and surrounds himself with pedophiles.

        • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 hours ago

          You think they don’t know? It’s not like this is a secret lol. He is a convicted felon.

          But sure, the next felony will be the one I’m sure. Lmoa

          • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            14 hours ago

            You think they don’t know?

            Yes. In fact, I’m certain they don’t. You have to understand, Trump voters don’t live in our reality. They live in a fabricated fantasyland created by the slop media they consume. They think Donald Trump is fighting the pedophiles, because that is what they have been told to believe. All of the attacks on him are “fake news” because they’re from mainstream media sources, which they have been told to never trust.

            If concrete evidence that they have been directly lied to is distributed to them by a source they trust, I can’t say for sure what would happen, but it’s probably the best chance for them to be deprogrammed.

            • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Sound like you don’t live in our reality my dude.

              If you keep underestimating everyone who doesn’t agree with you, it’ll be difficult to think of true, inclusive change.

              They know. And they understand. The just reach different conclusions and actions with the same information and capabilities as you.

              Like you, most people aren’t passive receptacles of what happens around them. But not everyone will react the same way or think the same thing as you.

              That’s doesn’t mean they ‘live in a fabricated fantasy land’. That’s just the pc way to dehumanize people.

              They are different people, and you need to see them as that if you actually care about them. Then you might be able to have honest, constructive conversations. People don’t disagree with facts, they disagree with people.

              And acting like they’re stupid and you’re God’s smartest cookie is an easy way to get people to disagree with you.

              Cheers.

              • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                You’re just being condescending and seem to have never interacted with them person to person. I live here. I deal with them daily. I have heard them double down on insane nonsense that I don’t know if you could dream of.

                90% of what you said are inferences you are making. I understand they are victims of propoganda. It doesn’t seem like you do.