• heyWhatsay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    10 hours ago

    It’s the equivalent of farmers voting for trump and getting screwed over, Bitcoin bros are next in line

    • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “bitcoin bros” who use custodial wallets and “bitcoin bros” who do high-frequency trading on Coinbase are not the same people. This is not good news any way you spin it, just further consolidation of power.

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I think most Bitcoin bros just care about the line going up; not about privacy/freedom. Trump and those around him are getting insanely wealthy from crypto in general.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    big deal, and fascism. NATO colonies copying the fascism is to be expected. Spirit of 2nd amendment is spirit of right to resist.

    Patriot Act’s name is meant to distract from fascist powers within it, and while bitcoin is not super anonymous if you use techniques that are now recommended to “crackdown”, there is improvement.

    Bitcoin’s superiority over gold is the ability to move to a more welcoming jurisdiction without border confiscation, or luggage weight, concerns, and so US/Colonies crackdown on “definancialization rights” may well lead to wealth drain from the empire.

  • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    To be fair, the author has a good point, but we knew this was coming, and Bitcoin did nothing to prevent it. Monero, however, did.

      • shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 hours ago

        It doesn’t need mixing because the protocol itself hides the sender, the receiver, and the amount as due course.

        This stuff is basically banning any privacy-preserving technology on a public blockchain, like Bitcoin, since it has no privacy by default.

  • Mugita Sokio@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Only centralized entities are affected by it. This isn’t a blanket ban on self-custody, as Lola Leetz puts it in a Nostr comment about it.

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      10 hours ago

      …yet. Authoritarianism creeps, it crawls silently, strategically, meticulously, knowing that far too few will notice or care until it’s too late.

      • msage@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m sorry, but WHAT?

        The US has been detaining citizens to foreign countries without due process.

        Supreme court validated ICE raids in cities.

        This is not ‘authoritarianism creeping’, it’s just doing a victory lap.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          51 minutes ago

          Yes, but that didn’t happen overnight. The authoritarian creep had been happening long before, but it’s important to remember that they don’t yet have total control; they can do a lot of horrible things with impunity, certainly, but they need to keep up appearances and move more slowly with other things so they have less resistance from whatever remains of the judiciary.

      • Mugita Sokio@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The people saying it’s a blanket ban is just spreading FUD about it right now. While it’s a valid concern, it’s highly unlikely the blanket ban will be seeping to DEX’s.