So, some of them believe they have the authority to use their siren and act like Italian police, almost causing an incident in the process.

I’m sure everything will turn out well.

I recently started playing Jak and Daxter II again (emulated), for the nostalgia. It’s pretty much as great as I remember it but the inverted x-axis on the camera is making me go nuts

Side question: does anyone know if manufacturers rely on entropy to get the required randomness or if they “enforce” patterns by selecting and directing pins?

Right tools and skills, which is an important part. Just buying the appropriate pick won’t magically make you able to open a disc detainer lock, but sure, wafer pins locks can literally be opened by randomly sticking a paperclip in it and using a tensioner.

GDPR should give you the right, but I’m not sure if they have a button you can click or if you need to email them about it

The day where platforms enshittify so bad they implode can’t come soon enough

Nope, although she probably wishes she was.

Just a reminder that “consumer” means human. They’re fucking over everyone in favour of “corporations” (aka a few select humans)

Yeah, for example when emulating GB/GBC/GBA games, simulating the slow LCD response time makes all the difference. Jittery shaking animations become soft blurs, and everything feels much closer to the authentic hardware

jfc overlaying 2 lines of text over a template via diffusion model has to be one of the most inefficient ways. Aside from the power used, I bet typing the prompt took more time than the 20 seconds it would’ve taken on imgflip

Absolutely. And remember to rotate your endpoint every once in a while

I wish Armagetronad wasn’t so forgotten and had more people in the servers :(

Did it ever stop?

deleted by creator

That sad hand is the best thing I’ve seen in a webcomic for a long time, thank you. It’s perfect

I am not saying privacy is a lost cause, I fully agree with you on your approach. But there’s a big difference between minimizing your footprint to avoid passive surveillance, and the FBI having your phone

I am not moving goalposts or making different statements, I’m not the user you were replying to.

I also mostly agree with you, but my angle is that the difference between “the government can get into virtually any phone” and “the government can get into most phones” is that the latter makes it seem like you can be “smart/knowledgeable enough” to avoid that, and that’s untrue. You should assume everything you keep on your phone can be extracted because of the nature of smartphone manufacturers, the supply chain etc, but I do not believe no phone can’t be broken into like OP was saying, thus “virtually any phone” seems fitting.

Virtually any phone I would say, yeah. Either by rubberhose cryptanalysis or by sheer time, money, and tools, they most likely can.

… murder is also illegal?

Nothing on X is organically viral now. Elon is the ultimate powertripping admin, and he will shape his website however he wants