• aks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 years ago

    I fully agree, but this is pretty much preaching to the choir, heh.

    • plu@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      Surprisingly, I haven’t seen many people take up the cause of writing XHTML only sites or even come at the web with an anti-bloat viewpoint, it’s mostly focused on privacy and software freedom.

      • aks@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 years ago

        I feel like they go hand in hand. Privacy usually means less bloat due to having less telemetry JS crap.

        Meanwhile I do enjoy reading a good XHTML site (Easy to read, to the point), I do still like seeing peoples creativity and making their websites looking like their own. Part of me misses the geocities era when all sites were like tiny pieces of someone. People spent effort making a site instead of spamming medium blogposts or w/e. There was personality in there, instead of corporate copy-paste design.

  • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.mlM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    XHTML 1.1 is an excellent standard, as are Gemini and Gopher for content creation. No bloat, allows enough flexibility.