Obviously cash is the more private option, but I have had trouble getting away from the convenience of using cards. Is there a way to use debit or credit cards and preserve privacy?
Obviously cash is the more private option, but I have had trouble getting away from the convenience of using cards. Is there a way to use debit or credit cards and preserve privacy?
I never said anything about public ATM footage in Telegram, the stuff you quoted is in response to the Admin and the hosting question. Most people, including myself, do not self-host for a bunch of reasons, it is cheaper and easier to upload your stuff into the cloud such as Telegram or Google Drive. My initial statement was that most providers, use and rely on third-party infrastructure and that externals could duplicate it, on their own, or they could be forced and that no one could find out. My statement regarding cheap and Telegram as an example was to show that people upload everything into the cloud, which is also the case, Google Drive and other services is full of Material, all sorts of material. Other services exist but they make maybe compared to big providers 10 percent of the traffic.
Most I know uses Google, AWS or Azure. Because they measure CPU work time, not even storage itself. That is how cheap they are. They are reliable, they are cheap as hell. If you want to build your own infrastructure like e.g. The-EYE did to host Terabytes of data you constantly need to upgrade, which is expensive. Oh well, and they went down because of what… money. The benefit is also that you do not need to worry, you pay for not only the provided services itself, also they take care of security issues etc. If you self-host you need to take care of all of that and upgrading the software alone is often not enough.
I rather trust experts who do this professional than some random dude who hosts his mini server that can be taken down without breaking a sweat. I tried that myself btw, for example I created a Tor server, it was not even public, took 2 hours until I got the first attack and it never stopped ever since then until I took it offline.
Your argumentation that we never do this or that is absolute redundant, assuming someone would do shady stuff with footage, no one would admit this anyway or he simply would be forced by contracts to never talk about such specific deals. However, it does not change anything regarding my statement that, if they can, they never delete things. Most people only delete stuff if they run out of storage, but typical scenario is run and forget it… until there are problems.
You claimed that banks never delete CCTV recordings from ATMs. So I really dont understand what you are arguing for or against.
Because the definition of deletion and removal of files are different these days.
Most networks hide your files but they are still stored on the server, despite the claim that they are deleted after xyz. Maybe from the index, but no one directly states from the servers or third-party servers that might be involved.
For example if you delete your account on Facebook, Discord and bunch of other services you still can access the files after you delete your Account. While your server, files are not visible, the URL will still work.
Most people - assume - that the word delete means that the provider or others that are somewhat involved with it actually physically delete everything, which is not the case.
But thats not how it works for a company that stores terrabytes of CCTV footage on Amazon S3. Either they pay for more and more storage over time (and it gets very expensive with video), or they pay a constant amount, and get a constant amount of storage. Which means they have to delete old files. Amazon certainly wont store anything at that scale for free.
I like to point out that delete all files might be impossible anyway, especially in Banks that record 24/7 a day. They do backups, if a bank claims - we delete all footage after X days, then they also need to delete all backup material, which I doubt they will do. The effort is very high.
I claim they delete or hide stuff from the normal storage servers, but they do not delete the backups and also I doubt that partner servers or other backup servers will do that. The effort to delete everything and hide specific things from backups would be huge and in not practicable. GDPR or DSGV also is not specific what delete means, physical delete files, or does it include backups too etc.
If I were a bank I would only delete stuff if,… if I ever run out of storage. Keeping such material is to value overall in case you need to go back 1 month or more to investigate a gang. Check how thieves checked out my bank and build strategies, some gangs work over MONTHS to exploit a bank’s weakness.
As said, you e.g. pay Amazon, Google these days for CPU time, the storage has no limit, Google even mention that directly that there is no limit, I mean there is but I saw piracy groups hosting PETABYTES of movies on Google Drive.
Yeah, no one said anything for free, in that I agree with you, but is cheaper than self-hosting, which was my overall point here. Which is why I mentioned some examples.
Maybe my definition forever is up for debate, but certainly more than they admit they do… Maybe only 7-10 years. No one knows. I know in Germany the fed keep documents 7-10 years, must do by law.
Of course deleted means there should be no copy of it. Backups are copies, so they are to be removed. Also, backups/archibe are usually compressed, not indexed and generally more expensive to access. ATM footage has no value at all for banks as far as I can tell, they are just there for legal reasons.