• optional@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        475 kcal

        Not so hard to calculate. It’s still stupid though, that they don’t have to print the values per 100g, as they do in Europe. That makes it really easy to compare two products with different package sizes.

        The value per serving is mostly useless, as a serving is just some made up amount, usually tiny to make the product look healthier. For example, a serving size of crisps could be 20g, which is not even a handful.

          • optional@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            12 days ago

            Oz or whatever strange body part comparison you guys prefer would also be fine for me. As long as it’s standardized between products.

            With 100 gramms/millilitres it’s a simple guideline:

            • <100 kcal: probably healthy
            • 100-200 kcal: mostly ok
            • >200 kcal: consume carefully

            Of cause it’s fine to consume oils (~700kcal/100ml) but they shouldn’t be the major part of your meal. And sugary drinks are obviously bad for you, even though they’ve got less than 100kcal/100ml.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        475 calories

        There’s 2.5 servings per bag, the serving size is listed as 2tbsp, there’s 190 calories in 2tbsp. So calories in the entire bag is just 2.5 * 190 calories