Quilter, which has raised more than $40 million from investors including Benchmark, Index Ventures, and Coatue, used its physics-driven AI to automate the design of a two-board computer system that booted successfully on its first attempt, requiring no costly revisions. The project, internally dubbed “Project Speedrun,” required just 38.5 hours of human labor compared to the 428 hours that professional PCB designers quoted for the same task.

  • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I may be hallucinating now, but I swear I remember nearly a decade ago there was a paper or articles about how CG PCBs were using some electrical tricks that were non standard to minimize space or something. The design purposefully had arcs or short circuits or something. Maybe it was a temperature thing? I did a more than cursory search and couldn’t find much, but I vividly remember having conversations about it. Anyone remember anything like that?

    • palordrolap@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      I seem to remember a story about how something - a neural net, or an early reinforced learning experiment - ended up accidentally exploiting a physics bug in a chip to achieve a result that should have gone through the chip’s expected circuitry instead.

      It was specific to that one particular chip, and swapping it out for another supposedly identical chip caused the calculation, or simulation, or whatever that was running on the larger system, to fail.

      That is, it wasn’t supposed to be exploiting physics glitches but that’s what happened.

      … I think I found it. It happened all the way back in the 1990s if this story is to be believed: https://www.damninteresting.com/on-the-origin-of-circuits/

    • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There was a story about a researcher using evolving algorithms to build more efficient systems on FPGAs. One of the weird shortcuts was some system that normally used a clock circuit, but none was available, and it made a dead-end circuit the would give a electric pulse when used, giving it a makeshift clock circuit. The big problem was that better efficiency often used quirks of the specific board, and his next step was to start testing the results on multiple FPGAs and using the overall fitness to get past that quirk/shortcut.

      Pretty sure this was before 2010. Found a possible link from 2001.

      • MountingSuspicion@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Yea. I didn’t call it AI because I’m not sure the exact method of generation. It may have been AI or maybe some other generation method.