Of the total area that is used by humans (Agriculture, Urban and Built-up Land),

  • urban and built-up land is 1m km²,
  • agriculture is 48m km²,

so agriculture is 48 of 49 millions km² used, that’s 98%. The remaining 2% are all streets and housing and other infrastructure together.

      • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        thanks for the reply

        I didn’t mean to be rude, but I thought short replies were the norm here.

        I’m just skeptical.

        I’m very much looking forward to your citations.

        thank you!

        • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          17 hours ago

          This thread is averaging paragraph length responses, what could have given you the idea that short-form demands for citations on claims you could verify with a trivial web search was the norm here? That seems like total BS to cover for being called out over your habit of rather arrogant sealioning.

          There’s a great deal more data available which also supports my conclusions, I encourage you to engage with the subject matter directly in light of that.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            16 hours ago

            your numbers are in per capita rates, but Asia is exploding in population, and still increasing in consumption per capita.

            I don’t think there is any reason to believe meat consumption is decreasing. it’s probably increasing

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              16 hours ago

              For someone that spends this much time policing other people’s claims, you’re remarkably bad at interpreting data or the initial claims said person actually made.

              • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                15 hours ago

                you’re remarkably bad at interpreting data

                saying it doesn’t make it true.

                if I’ve said something wrong, you can explain it

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            There’s a great deal more data available which also supports my conclusions, I encourage you to engage with the subject matter directly in light of that.

            our exchanges, until now, have been solely on the subject matter. this aside belies an interest, on your part, in making the matter personal instead.

            please, engage with the subject matter.

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Would you mind consolidating your replies? This is going to get confusing. Also, no, I had already criticized your behavior prior to that comment.

                • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  It’s like engaging with a bad-faith hydra - one of these is literally just a single word reply. If you can’t even make your nonsense feasible to engage with why should I extend you the courtesy of treating you as anything other than the poor troll you’re behaving like?

                  You’ve misunderstood my initial claims and/or the data, which are both abundantly clear - and on top of that you’ve spent this whole time acting like a jerk. I’m not going to reward this behavior.

                  • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    13 hours ago

                    this is just posturing and accusations. your evidence doesn’t sufficiently support the claim you e made, and now you’re making excuses not to present sufficient evidence. I strongly suspect you don’t have it.

          • commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            16 hours ago

            your habit of rather arrogant sealioning.

            asking for sources for dubious claims isn’t sealioning, but your accusation of bad faith is, itself, bad faith

            • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              That’s not how bad faith engagement works, and my claims are not dubious, they’re directly supported by the data.