• polymerwitch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 years ago

    Because the servers that were banned were extreme right-wing instances not socialist instances. If a club I go dance at lets socialists in, but tells nazi punks to fuck off I think that’s a pretty cool club. If a bar lets in nazis I won’t go there.

    First they came for the Nazis, and I did not speak out, because I’m not a Nazi. Everything was pretty cool after that, because taking away a platform from people who advocate for genocide is totally reasonable and a good call.

    • Nevar@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 years ago

      I replied to a different comment but I think there’s a difference between servers (bars) banning other servers, and apps disallowing access to certain servers. If the app became the defacto connection to Mastodon, blacklisting a server will result in new servers being created, and then those will be banned as well. Eventually it would be easier to whitelist servers. At that point the tusky app becomes the gatekeeper for ideologies. Which I think would be bad.

      • salarua@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 years ago

        you’re saying that as if Tusky was the only way to access Mastodon out there (which it is not). besides, Nazis should be locked out, because, y’know, Nazis are bad

        • Nevar@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 years ago

          Yes, Nazis are bad.

          I’d just point this article out by Chris Hedges for why I disagree with Tuskys actions:

          https://www.mintpressnews.com/chris-hedges-cancel-culture-where-liberalism-goes-to-die/275373/

          “They were students in or recent graduates of rich and leading colleges and universities,” he writes of the audience. “They were mean and tough but somehow, I sensed that there wasn’t a radical in the bunch. For if they were radical how could they laugh at a poor ignorant farmer who didn’t know his left hand from his right? If they had been radical they would have been weeping, asking what had produced him. And if they had been radical they would not have been sitting, soaking up a film produced for their edification and enjoyment by the Establishment of the establishment — CBS.”